Talk:List of neighbourhoods of Jamshedpur

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Dalma Hill.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:46, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Dalma Hill.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a disaster.

Only one citation. Tons of grammatical errors. It needs someone knowledgeable to salvage it. FPTI (talk) FPTI (talk) 06:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed FPTI - unfortunately the article was created by User:Weareme234 and largely edited by him and his socks. Arjayay (talk) 11:25, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion criteria

As stated at Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists, Wikipedia:Notability#Stand-alone lists and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Adding individual items to a list:-

All lists must have clearly defined inclusion criteria
Every entry should meet the notability criteria for its own article. Red-linked entries are acceptable if the entry is verifiably a member of the list, and it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future. This prevents indiscriminate lists, and prevents individual lists from being too large to be useful to readers.
Editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.
All list entries must follow Wikipedia's core content policies of Verifiability (by citing reliable sources as references), No original research, and Neutral point of view

This list fails most of these requirements in that:-

There are no clearly defined inclusion criteria
Most of the entries are not "verifiably a member of the list" in that they have neither an article nor a reference
As per the above rules, all redlinks, without a citation, should be removed
Redlinks with a citation, should only remain if it is "reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming", although how this can/should be assessed is unclear. However, there is only one citation, about a football club, not about a neighbourhood of Jamshedpur.

I will add wikilinks to all the entries and remove all redlinks, as per the above guidelines, as none have citations. I will also use a standardized, list format, as there are too many different formats in use - Arjayay (talk) 11:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FPTI - I Have brought the article in line with the above exclusions - drastic, but it needed it.
What remains is to agree the inclusion criteria. As per item 3 above, "Editors may .... choose to limit large lists by only including .... those with Wikipedia articles" I propose this is the most appropriate inclusion criteria - any objections? - Arjayay (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]