Talk:List of named devils in Dungeons & Dragons
This page was proposed for deletion by TTN (talk · contribs) on 3 February 2020. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lilis (Dungeons & Dragons) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 November 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of named devils in Dungeons & Dragons. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Cozbinaer was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 October 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of named devils in Dungeons & Dragons. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Focalor (Dungeons & Dragons) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 May 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of named devils in Dungeons & Dragons. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Recommendations
[edit]I suggest considering merging some content from Lords of the Nine Hells and Reckoning of Hell into this article. BOZ (talk) 00:19, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Images
[edit]I disagree with the removal of the major figures because NFLIST criteria 6. As Asmodeus has his own page, placing the image here is not sufficient, nor is the servant or regular dukes, we need the most notable and notorious figures of this 30+ year game and use them sparingly. BOZ did not seems to want Glasya gone either, and given the numerous publications and re-rewriting throughout the years I think it merits it. As some of these could go back to full articles with some sourcing, keeping a 1/10th the images seems fine. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Phrasing
[edit]"Amduscias is inspired by the real-life Amdusias." Could someone find a better wording for this? Inspiration fails me at the moment, or I would have edited it myself, but I suggest that this wording implies that we believe demons/devils are real, which is neither true nor diplomatic. :) 50.159.124.105 (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- "Real-world" is probably better, so I switched to that. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 14:48, 19 December 2015 (UTC)