Talk:List of mechanical keyboards
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of mechanical keyboards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150910052527/http://www.pfu.co.jp/hhkeyboard/hhkbpro2/ to http://www.pfu.co.jp/hhkeyboard/hhkbpro2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Too broad keyboard names
[edit]Some vendors, e.g. Razer, have a huge range of keyboards (many different keyboard families and different underlying key technology, e.g. pure mechanical vs. opto-mechanical).
Perhaps add several rows, one for each main type (whatever that means), for some vendors?
--Mortense (talk) 12:51, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
Open source hardware?
[edit]Hi,
the entry for the Input Club keyboard links to opensource, which is quite general (although its leading section only talks about software). Maybe the link should be, more specifically, to open-source hardware? —Gennaro Prota•Talk 13:16, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
OS support
[edit]Should there be a column indicating whether the manufacture has native support for an operating system keyboard layout i.e. macOS, and/or Windows including keycaps for modifier keys and software? Notahashtag (talk) 06:34, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Innaccurate title/article purpose
[edit]The vast majority of "keyboards" listed in the table are actually brands that manufacture multiple models of mechanical keyboards. These brands are judged and compared as mechanical keyboards; I doubt you could find a citation meeting Wikipedia's rigorous standards describing whether Logitech as a company has n-key rollover, and as for their keyboards, they have models with and without. Either all companies should be pruned from the list, which would remove most entries, or the article should be renamed to something like "List of mechanical keyboard manufacturers" and all of the few actual keyboards on the list should be removed. Kaotao (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)