Talk:List of mayors of Omaha, Nebraska

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Nebraska / Omaha Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Nebraska portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska - Omaha (assessed as Low-importance).

Dahlman

Someone really should write an article on Cowboy Dahlman. He lived in Tom Dennison's back pocket. – Freechild (BoomCha) 20:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palin?

Is Palin really relevant here? Half the sourcing in the article concerns her, but I'm not sure she's ever spent much time in Omaha.--T. Anthony (talk) 06:33, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Half the sourcing"? There are three sources, and the reference to the Governor of Alaska in the article is not specific to any one person; rather, its ambiguous. Let's not blow it out of proportion. • Freechild'sup? 13:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are four sources for the article, not three, and two of them are specifically about Palin. Two is half of four. This isn't that hard to figure out.--T. Anthony (talk) 07:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]