Talk:List of manias
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Move
[edit]Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was no consensus to move. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Glossary of manias → -mania — This should never have been moved. The subject should be -mania, the English suffix. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support. While this may not theoretically follow the WP:MOS, the article is about a bound morpheme. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- If it's about a bound morpheme then it needs to be deleted. If it's about a form of insanity/excess that doesn't necessarily end in 'mania' then you get to keep it. Them's the rules.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note it's considered bad form to vote and propose.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- "It's considered bad form to vote and propose." Really? I would say the opposite. I've made some proposals I don't support and some I do. It's better to be clear. — AjaxSmack 15:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Current name avoids WP:DICDEF arguments for deletion. --Cybercobra (talk) 02:38, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Wouldn't List of manias be more in line with similar articles at Wikipedia? — AjaxSmack 15:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Glossaries are lists anyway; lists of words with definitions. To be honest they sit very uncomfortably in an encyclopedia; they probably should all be moved to become appendixes in the Wiktionary.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, glossaries are lists and my point was that, at Wikipedia, they are usually titled "List of XXX". — AjaxSmack 15:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Do you have a reference to that being a generally agreed guideline or policy?- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 16:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- WikiProject Glossaries would probably beg to differ. --Cybercobra (talk) 18:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't say "guideline or policy". I said "usually." WikiProject Glossaries can beg all it wants. Link to the articles at Portal:Contents/List of glossaries/Society and social sciences for actual examples. — AjaxSmack 18:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, glossaries are lists and my point was that, at Wikipedia, they are usually titled "List of XXX". — AjaxSmack 15:36, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Glossaries are lists anyway; lists of words with definitions. To be honest they sit very uncomfortably in an encyclopedia; they probably should all be moved to become appendixes in the Wiktionary.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose unless you want the article deleted, in which case, go ahead.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 15:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, non-alphanumeric characters should be avoided, especially as the first character of a page name. More importantly, pages dedicated principally to the definition and dictionary-like explanation of suffixes are frequently brought up at AfD. Names that draw attention to word form, rather than conceptual meaning, invite such deletion. Cnilep (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I would support moving to List of manias, and making this about the psychological conditions only. Jafeluv (talk) 09:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose — I would support moving to List of manias
— V = I * R (talk) 20:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
I am not apposed to the move. At the beggining of 2009 the list was completely out of date so I have made a number of additions. I will be making more additions throughout 2010. If anyone wants to talk to me about this email me on SMargan@bigpond.net.au —Preceding unsigned comment added by SMargan (talk • contribs) 03:07, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Correction
[edit]The definition of "dacnomania" is incorrect. I'm changing it. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dacnomania
This wrong definition might have been a wrong translation from italian, "mordere", which means "to bite" instead of "to murder". --Monsieur.lefou (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Is it a joke?
[edit]The term 'monomania' is listed twice. Well played Wikipedia. Well played. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.189.178.84 (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
Requested move 9 January 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to List of manias. No such user (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Glossary of manias → List of manias – I think this page better fits the definition of a list of manias, than it does what we normally think of as a glossary. List of manias is already a redirect, and very few pages link here currently, so swapping them over should be relatively painless. There was a move request a long time ago so I can't be sure this is uncontentious (note that even back then 'List of manias' was actually a common suggestion.) JeffUK 17:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. This article is structured as a Glossary. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:18, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- But it's not a very well structured glossary, the definitions of the words aren't even full sentences, whereas if they were in a list with an 'Obsession' column it would make a whole lot more sense. It's a bit of a catch-22, I can easily restructure it to a list, I think that would look a lot better to as per List_of_phobias; but while it's called 'Glossary' that would be strange. I suppose I could do this on List of manias now leaving this here to see which works best. JeffUK 22:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- Support - lists are more appropriate for an encyclopedia Red Slash 23:12, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Better Sources.
[edit]'Pseudomania' leads to an external site, as opposed to wiktionary/dedicated page. 82.47.246.231 (talk) 00:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)