Talk:List of lunar eclipses in the 20th century

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Eclipses Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Eclipses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Documentation

See: User:SockPuppetForTomruen/saros_project

List presentation

I would suggest a list of prior eclipses in reverse chronological order, and a list of predicted eclipses in chronological order. Any thoughts? Peter Grey 03:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone watching here? I'm curious what the value of a datatable on Wikipedia that is inferior to the NASA link that is is apparently copied from?

I've got my own smaller sampling, following Saros cycles, with simple graphics showing the Zodiac, moon's path, and earth's shadow. It's crude but much more interesting to me, or something like it. [1] Tom Ruen 23:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What I find most interesting about this listing is how the total and partial eclipses are clustered into groups. It would be cool to draw a graph of this data (total and partial durations in each event) Tom Ruen (talk) 19:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of solar eclipses in the 16th century which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]