Talk:List of local service districts in New Brunswick

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: New Brunswick Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.

Untitled

Chaleur (Is this Chaleur Bay, I can't find any place or parish called this)Hogie75 12:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

It's in Durham and Colborne Parishes in Restigouche county; the remainder of the two Parishes is in the LSD of Lorne, which is different from the LSD Parish of Lorne in Victoria County. — Preceding comment added by G. Timothy Walton (talk • contribs) 13:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved by Resolute. --BDD (talk) 17:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

List of Local Service Districts in New Brunswick → List of local service districts in New Brunswick – (over redirect) per WP:TITLEFORMAT. The term "local service district(s)" is not a proper noun. It is also "local service district(s)" according to New Brunswick legislation. It should only be capitalized when it is part of the official legal name of the LSD, such as "Foo Local Service District" or "Local Service District of Foo". Hwy43 (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Cleanup required

This article is WP:TOOBIG, even for a list. It has been weighed down with significant granular details within the "Services" and "Notes" columns. The amount of details here are excessive and more appropriate for the individual articles for the LSDs themselves. Further, despite being within columns that are enabled for sorting, the details are so vast that sorting either ascending or descending does not provide any meaningful results. It is so bogged down that nothing happens when I click the "Former local service districts" or "Special service areas" links in the table of contents. The page does not jump to these sections like it should upon clicking these links.

Also, the first two columns are redundant. I get the intent, which is to enable proper sorting of their given/common/root names where their official legal names would otherwise prevent that from occurring. However there is a solution for that. Visit the table within the list section at List of municipal districts in Alberta. The code <span style="display:none">Acadia</span> enables "Acadia No. 34" to be sorted first, ahead of "Athabasca County", despite its official legal name being the "Municipal District (MD) of Acadia No. 34".

I hope this constructive feedback will lead to improvements. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These changes are on my to-do list but I get distracted by other issues (like the election just passed). I will make the nowiki tag the first priority.

Excuse me while I blanch at the idea of editing, often creating, 315 articles, which would also involve killing some existing articles for service areas. I guess the maps will have to wait longer for me to figure out an easy way to do them. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. There is no urgency and other off-wiki priorities persist too. Just noting it for now as I will likely swing back to do more myself when I have larger pockets of free time, and hope that those future efforts won't be viewed as controversial.

Not sure I understand the comments about the 315 articles, service areas and maps. If these are other things on your to do list with higher priority, by all means. Again, no urgency. Hwy43 (talk) 15:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SUPPORT, I believe instead of all the articles for the small communities, the articles should be moved (where possible) to their larger Local Service District as most of these small communities are really not notable. Hogie75 (talk) 22:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]