Talk:List of judges of the Federal Court of Australia

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Law Mid‑importance

	Australia portal List of judges of the Federal Court of Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of judges of the Federal Court of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524191024/http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/view_document.aspx?ID=198910&TABLE=HANSARDR to http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/view_document.aspx?ID=198910&TABLE=HANSARDR

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Judges or Current Judges

What is the difference between the "Judges" chart and the "Current Judges" chart? Are they redundant? Thank you. Knope7 (talk) 03:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is slightly more information in the current judge list, eg mandatory retirement, which is mostly empty. The balance can be incorporated in the main list under comments. As the list is now sortable it is easy to see who are the current judges by sorting on end date. I propose to merge the information into the main list unless anyone has strong view that it should be kept. Find bruce (talk) 22:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As there was no objection merged the two lists, omitting the columns "mandatory retirement" and "education" as these were mostly empty.

Judges transcluded from list

I have moved the list of current judges by location from the Federal Court page to here & then transcluded it, so that article will appear as it has done. The main reason is so that when there is a change to the judges, only one article needs to be updated, hopefully cutting down on conflicts between the two lists. Find bruce (talk) 03:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neil/John Young

Any reason why he is called "John Young" in the article? His name is Neil J Young and as far as I know (anecdotal, sure) he is always known as Neil Young. See https://www.vicbar.com.au/profile/6018 Fat Red (talk) 22:50, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because at the time he was added to the list his article was John Young (judge) and subsequently the article had been moved. The problem with anecdote and recollection is that it can be wrong. No matter, his article cites sources for him being commonly known as Neil. --Find bruce (talk) 02:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]