Talk:List of historic sites preserved along Rochambeau's route

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution BL‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

BL

This article has been rated as BL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

National Register of Historic Places

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Related	This article has been rated as Related-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Rhode Island Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Rhode Island portal This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island (assessed as Low-importance).

John Fell House

"John Fell House", of Allendale, New Jersey, is listed (first in fact), but the link goes only to a bio article John Fell (judge) with no information about a house. John Fell House is currently a redlink, and I see no such listing in National Register of Historic Places listings in Bergen County, New Jersey. I would like to add coordinates for the house to this article if its location can be found and if it can be confirmed to have been on the route. But there's currently no source supporting its mention at all. --do ncr am 20:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Development of list-article and related articles (with pings)

This list-article, developed in the past by User:Polaron and myself, now indexes revised articles in Category:Historic places on the Washington–Rochambeau Revolutionary Route. Please note that some of the linked articles have been developed more than others. All of the roadway segments and three of the four camp sites have photographs, most taken by User:Magicpiano and at least one by User:Sphilbrick. The March Route of Rochambeau's Army: Manship Road-Barstow Road benefits from three photos; a couple others have two photos. The Fifth Camp of Rochambeau's Infantry is probably the most developed camp site article.

For the list-article, I have added coordinates and rearranged the list by east-to-west order. The linked Bing map will display the locations (you may have to change from usecache=1 to usecache=0 in the URL to see them all). IMO, the version right now has too much detail on the road segment items, and not enough detail on the buildings, camp sites, and other historic districts along the route.

In the past (2011), there was confrontational editing on the series of articles. It was arguable then that multiple articles contained "boilerplate" and should not exist separately, but instead should all redirect to this one list-article which would contain almost all the information previously included in the separate articles. Now, I think it is more clear that sufficient development has been done in the separate articles--especially with the inclusion of photos now available--that attempting to merge all their material into one list-article is not desirable. Please discuss alternative ideas for development here. If someone wishes for all the separate articles to be eliminated, please do discuss here, and let's have a proper consensus-building process. If there is disagreement on that, I think the proper way forward would be to open a formal multiple-article AFD to bring in opinions of uninvolved others. Comments welcome. --do ncr am 12:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]