This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Per discussion on the deletion topic of the article, it became clear that the article was in major need of re-evaluation to clarify what qualifies as a "sports film". Before I put my own foot in my mouth with suggestions, I'd like to discuss with other editors if anyone is interested in some suggestions of where we could take this topic. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever the precise details end up being, we need to follow the sources. As WP:LISTCRITERIA says, Avoid original or arbitrary criteria that would synthesize a list that is not plainly verifiable in reliable sources. I suspect that the "Highest-grossing films by sport" section fails this, for instance. The best idea would probably be to start over from scratch using sources on the overarching topic. TompaDompa (talk) 00:48, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
