Talk:List of healthcare reform advocacy groups in the United States

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links

Let's discuss this insertion of links. Well, the first one, to Healthcare-NOW!'s website, is inappropriate, since we already have the article to link to. The second, the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Health Care, has a red link so create the article there or post the external link there. It doesn't belong at the bottom. The third, Physicians for a National Health Program, is again an article as is the fourth, Progressive Democrats of America. What reason is there to separate them into the external links section by themselves? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would agree that external links are wholey inapropriate, for the reasons stated by Ricky81682. Also the Redlinks in the list should be addressed. Wikipedia is optimized for readers over editors, unreferenced redlinks can be unhelpful to readers. Red link articles do not add content or meaning to the encyclopedia and should be at most posted on this talkpage for development, not the main space. --Hu12 (talk) 19:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the dead links (ones that went to pages which did not yet exist).Sarah sko1221^talk 01:59, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I removed two entries that were non-notable entries that included external links to their websites. --Ronz (talk) 16:36, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]