Jump to content

Talk:List of government animal eradication programs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]
  • This is an interesting article. I don't have anything to add at this time, but I think more detail needs to be entered with regards to specific cases. Also note that it would be nice to have references such as external links to accredited magazine articles (I'm thinking National Geographic might be a prime example) ... summarize and link. :D

Move?

[edit]

An intersting idea for an article, but perhaps not the best name. Political implies something it probably isn't. State sanctioned perhaps, or government sanctioned. Any ideas? Sabine's Sunbird talk 15:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I see where you are going, but perhaps simply tack this onto an article like Persecution of Animals under which there could be historically significant examples of large-scale poaching (maybe such as historical poaching of rhinos), intentional eradication (such as the note about wolves or tigers), and maybe about unintentional eradication (such as overhunting of you pick your species). The only problem I can see is that it could become a spectacularly long-winded article. Also, this could spark opinionated entries such as the Canadian Seal Hunt which is going on right now. It might be opening a can of worms, so-to-speak. Em3rald 06:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I had trouble with the term "political persecution", and have replaced that with "politically endorsed exermination". I am not really happy with this title either. If someone has a better name for this, please be bold and keep this article moving. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've moved it to "list of government animal eradication programs". I believe this better reflects what these efforts are usually called (there are several different "eradication programs"s in the US, for instance).--Pharos 03:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pest Species

[edit]

I noticed that the article doesn't mention modern-day exterminations of non-native species (e.g., Australia's rabbit problem.) Was this intentional? --Lode Runner 20:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I believe these should be mentioned as well, or at least that we should have another page for such eradication programs.--Pharos 03:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of government animal eradication programs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_government_animal_eradication_programs&oldid=1199953340"