Talk:List of fictional Scots

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of fictional Scots article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 17 June 2023, see discussion.
no consensus, 9 July 2010 (UTC), see discussion.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wallace: fictional?

Why is Wallace included in the list? Robert the Bruce, another historical person, was also portrayed in "Braveheart" - where does it end?--Thelema12 (talk) 22:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These people seem to have mythological status like Robin Hood or King Arthur. Also, please see Contesting Liberty: The Figure of William Wallace in Poems by Hemans, Hogg, and Baillie in which accounts of Wallace and the Bruce were specifically reworked to suit English taste. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of fictional Scots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609185407/http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/celebrity-interviews/2010/03/22/new-doctor-who-star-karen-gillan-it-s-great-to-be-a-scots-redhead-in-the-tardis-86908-22129950/ to http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/showbiz/celebrity-interviews/2010/03/22/new-doctor-who-star-karen-gillan-it-s-great-to-be-a-scots-redhead-in-the-tardis-86908-22129950/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about Donald and Douglas from the Railway Stories/Thomas & Friends?

They appear to be from Scotland, so do locomotives count too? 2600:1700:7900:C50:D4DA:5659:137E:B734 (talk) 00:38, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Y A good idea. An entry has been added. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:55, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]