Talk:List of extreme points of Finland

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unsourced, inaccurate coordinates

I find it ironic that the coordinates are given up to 1 second precision (about 20 meters) when their accuracy is nothing like that (e.g. Bogskär is about 10 minutes off). Compare to fi:Suomen maantiede. --Jmk (talk) 00:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have adjusted Bogskär and checked the others, using http://kansalaisen.karttapaikka.fi/ All others were correct within 100 m. Wikipedia as opposite to other websites, people who find incorrect info should correct it, rather than ask someone to do it. --BIL (talk) 15:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't agree that these 59°48′30″N 22°54′0″E / 59.80833°N 22.90000°E Tulliniemi coordinates were correct within 100 m. Looking at Karttapaikka, they point (approximately) to an artificial breakwater (for that they are controversial anyway), while the natural landmass goes clearly more south at 59°48′28.74″N 22°54′47.22″E / 59.8079833°N 22.9131167°E. The distance between those points is about 750 meters. But you are right that one could simply fix it. Done that. --Jmk (talk) 13:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to BIL's claim, Nuorgam 70°05′22″N 27°57′45″E / 70.08944°N 27.96250°E was not "correct within 100 m" either. The point is given with 1 second (~ 20 meter) precision, but is in fact ~70 meters on the Norwegian side, and ~300 meters too south compared to the northernmost point in the river 70°05′32″N 27°57′20″E / 70.09222°N 27.95556°E, or if you prefer, ~200 meters too south compared to the northernmost land point 70°05′28″N 27°56′53″E / 70.09111°N 27.94806°E. Will fix that. --Jmk (talk) 19:08, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]