Talk:List of equipment of the Canadian Coast Guard

Lists List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of equipment of the Canadian Coast Guard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of equipment of the Canadian Coast Guard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924145448/http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/canada/story/1.3126130 to http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/canada/story/1.3126130

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ship classes

The CCG does not use "class" they use type as in the function of the ship. The "class" is a series of ships built to similar requirements. The CCG does not distinguish by this, but reliable secondary sources, i.e Wikipedia:Reliable sources, says that these ships are a "class". This page is not the CCG's page. This page is not associated with the Government of Canada. Llammakey (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The CCG does use class as stated in their naming policy on the internet https://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/publications/fleet-flotte/vessel-naming-noms-des-navires/part1-eng.html . Naming the vessels in a class with the first vessel in the class being the name of the class eis total false information. If that what Wikipedia is going to put forth to the public it is totally wrong. I have read may history books about the CCG and they did youse a type structure in the past utilizing Type 100 to 1300. Any source you are using to come up with fictional class names should not be relied on when CCG has a clear class type named in its published documentation. The statement that the page is not associated with CCG is false as most of the info and images are directly from the CCG. Thread1972 (talk) 18:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]