Talk:List of environmental podcasts

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 March 2022 by reviewer Artem.G (talk · contribs).

Podcasting Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AfC Review

Hello Artem.G, thank you for reviewing my draft. Unfortunately I hadn't spent much time on this one so I realize it was relatively underdeveloped. I'll be improving it over the course of the next week or so. I added wikilinks to a couple of podcasts that already have pages, but I thought I'd mention that WP:NLIST says a "list topic is considered notable ... if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources." I believe the current sources clearly demonstrate that this is a group or set that has been discussed in independent and reliable sources. It's also worth noting that WP:LISTCRITERIA says that "Selection criteria ... should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources." My unambiguous and objective criteria for inclusion on the list is that each entry on the list has been discussed in reliable sources. Although many do not have Wikipedia pages yet, WP:NOTEWORTHY seems to indicate that not every entry needs to be notable while WP:NPOSSIBLE seems to indicate that just because a topic does not have a Wikipedia page yet does not mean it isn't notable. To demonstrate this I've started drafts for Draft:Boomtown (podcast) and Draft:Floodlines both of which are very clearly notable. I would also like to direct you to Category:Podcasting lists, which I understand is an example of WP:OTHERSTUFF but it provides a list of similar articles that can be used as a good gauge as to what has previously been accepted. TipsyElephant (talk) 13:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little uncertain why you declined the draft on the basis that environmentalism is a neologism. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]