Talk:List of endangered languages in India

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles

Languages

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in March 2019.

Created list, needs tons of gnomish work

Just made a this list. It needs a lot, lot, lot of work, similar to all the work I put into the List of endangered languages in Europe. Ping me if you want to know what needs to be done and how to do it. I'm sure I will work on it eventually, but "eventually" is an extremely elastic term.. so if you're interested, jump in an {{sofixit}}. Ling.Nut3 (talk) 04:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the ISO codes. Now that every language is linked to its article, they are redundant. The UNESCO ref will always be there if there are questions, but UNESCO is sometimes wrong, like the code for a Niger-Congo language that is only spoken in Nigeria (I checked: that wasn't a copy error on LingNut's part). Several of the ISO codes that were here have since been retired, and the Ethnologue links were dead, and several languages listed as 'none' now have ISO codes. This was therefore a WP:CONTENTFORK that required separate maintenance that it was not getting. Same rational for the other boxes, though Mexico is still a bit of a mess. — kwami (talk) 14:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Language family information

Do you think we should add the language family of each language next to the name of the language to make the list more informative? TheAwesome21 (talk) 18:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I actually agree with this. There is not much information about the languages other than the area in which they are spoken. I think other additional notes could be added (if a few villages spoke the language, it is spoken by this ethnic group, etc.) if there is space to do so. 64.124.38.140 (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]