Talk:List of emperors of Tibet

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Emperors or Kings or Rulers

Based on the description in the article and the Wikipedia page of the persons listed here, is it correct to call this a list of emperors of Tibet? Or would it be more appropriate to change the word emperors to something else? --Chadsnook (talk) 07:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say you're right, it "List of rulers of Tibet" would be better. Bertport (talk) 14:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is called the Tibetan Empire, so perhaps emperor would be appropriate. Engti (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Why does Yarlung redirect to this. Yarlung is a valley. Engti (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To very briefly try to answer the above questions - the kings of the Yarlung region began conquering other parts of what we now call Tibet (variable as that might be). Under Songsten Gampo large regions were conquered and these were greatly expanded under the rulers who followed him. Even though "Tibet" shrank at times it remained far larger than most medieval kingdoms and included a range of different peoples - so I believe "Emperor" is the term of choice. Best wishes, John Hill (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Absent any opposition, I will merge this to Yarlung dynasty and cover all details in depth. CFORK. TrangaBellam (talk) 08:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]