Jump to content

Talk:List of earthquakes in Japan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Orphaned references in List of Earthquakes in Japan

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of List of Earthquakes in Japan's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "USGS":

  • From 1933 Sanriku earthquake: "Historical Earthquakes:The 1933 Sanriku earthquake". United States Geological Survey. 14 March 2008. Retrieved 2008-07-16.
  • From 1946 Nankaidō earthquake: "The 1946 Nankaido earthquake". USGS. 13 March 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-29.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Messed up

[edit]

The table is messed up. Some dates have been shifted to magnitude, and many other errors occur - this happens when I try to sort the earthquakes by date or magnitude, the raw table (after page load) looks fine. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:38, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is the decision to group the recent aftershocks in a single date. It sounds like a good idea until you try sorting the table. I'll try and fix that. Pichpich (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Please note that when you do lists that are dated, please please please have the newest dates at the top, oldest dates at the bottom.138.67.12.12 (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC) John Stockwell[reply]

Double Current events

[edit]

The march 11th quake has two entries. these should be merged at the bottom of the chart. Also, the epicenters need to be cleaned up, to indicate which represent aftershocks, and which one is the main quake, or perhaps put the aftershocks as separate quakes. 216.16.232.122 (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sortable table

[edit]

The choice was made earlier today to group the main quake with the aftershocks that occurred on the same day rather than list them separately. That sounds perfectly reasonable. However the use of rowspans destroys the possibility to sort the table according, say, to magnitude. That's a really bad side effect for such an article so I've separated the aftershocks (there was already a separately listed foreshock) Pichpich (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it's better. Any chance we can get magnitude numbers for January 13, 1945 and April 9, 1858? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The ja.wiki gives a magnitude 6.8 (Richter) for the 1945 quake and 6.7 (Richter) for the 1858 quake. I don't speak/read any Japanese though so I don't know how solid the references are and given the circumstances around the 1945 quake and the age of the 1858 quake, these are probably guesstimates anyway. Still, it's tempting to include them to complete the table. Pichpich (talk) 23:52, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support moving them here, if they are reference, the reference can be copied. Sooner or later, somebody will translate and/or review them... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 23:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As the one who did it, my apologies; I thought it looked neater that way and didn't notice that the table was sortable. (Someone really ambitious could improve the sorting javascript to make it able to cope, of course...) 71.41.210.146 (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Aftershocks

[edit]

Why does this article contain a list of aftershocks of the 2011 Sendai earthquake and tsunami? when nearly every earthquake has aftershocks?Peaceworld111 (talk) 00:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well there's a threshold of 6.5 Mw to be listed. It so happens that the recent earthquake was so powerful that even its aftershocks (and one foreshock) happen to reach that threshold. I agree that it looks a bit silly though I'm not really happy with completely removing the info either. Pichpich (talk) 02:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the threshold

[edit]

I'm proposing to change the lede and change the criteria for inclusion from "6.5 magnitude or above" to "over 7.0 magnitude or which caused significant damage or casualties." This is the threshold for other lists such as List of 21st-century earthquakes. Comments? Pichpich (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be fine with "7.0 or above or which caused significant damage or casualties." ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To be added

[edit]

I've come across the following earthquakes, at least some of which might qualify for inclusion in this list. I don't have full information about them, so I'm listing them here instead of in the article. Some of the names are likely not correct.

If someone would like to research these and add them to the list, as necessary, that would be great. - dcljr (talk) 06:49, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

USGS or JMA?

[edit]

There was an earthquake today which the USGS has logged at M6.7 and the JMA at M7.0. Which figure do we go with? Right on the borderline of eligibility for inclusion... Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 08:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We shouldn't be listing this one at all. Our list articles should not contain low intensity events. Dawnseeker2000 17:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well the lead states "This is a list of earthquakes in Japan with either a magnitude greater than or equal to 7.0 ...". If it is, indeed, a 7.0 then it is of a large enough intensity to warrant inclusion. But if it's only a 6.7 then sure, I agree. I just don't know which figure is more reliable in this instance: the largest earthstopquake tracking system or the local one? Buttons to Push Buttons (talk | contribs) 09:57, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The Japanese and American agencies are both fine to use. One is not considered more reliable than the other; they just arrived at different figures due to different equipment/networks/methods. Our lists should probably start including intensity as a basis for inclusion. Dawnseeker2000 18:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of earthquakes in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of earthquakes in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on List of earthquakes in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of earthquakes in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on List of earthquakes in Japan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No tsunamis created when USA did atomic testing in Pacific

[edit]

Were there absolutely no tsunamis generated when the USA did atomic bomb testing in the Pacific Ocean? CaribDigita (talk) 03:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kawasumi scale

[edit]

A citation was added to the Kawasumi scale back in 2011 and many magnitude types were changed to Mk at that point. The Kawasumi scale is little used in the scientific literature - google scholar gives just six hits, so it's not clear that we should use it here. When I have a moment, I will go through and check the magnitude types used in this list. Mikenorton (talk) 10:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another problem with the Kawasumi scale is that it, like the Modified Mercalli scale is an intensity scale.[1]--Samesawed (talk) 15:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
According to this USGS report there is a Kawasumi magnitude scale (see page 6), although it is derived from intensity data. Mikenorton (talk) 15:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 02:53, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unreadable

[edit]

What a badly organized page this is, if one is viewing it on a smartphone. It is unreadable. Get real, people! Only 0.001% of the world's population are NOT viewing this on a smart phone. Charles Clark (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deads & Photos in Tables?

[edit]

Hi folks, I changed number of deaths to 19,759 in 2011 Tohoku as in the main article. I also would like to ask why there are photos inside the table. Removing the photos would help readers in reading the table.Kavas (talk) 23:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_earthquakes_in_Japan&oldid=1205275200"