Talk:List of druids and neo-druids

Two subjects?

Isn't this really two seperate subjects? The only connection the ancients have with the moderns is the presumptive emulation by the later kind of the former. Should these pages be separated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.158.124.203 (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also shouldn't mix historical and legendary

The reader has no clue as to which of these if any have any historical basis. The first article I checked, Bec mac Dé, is about a legendary Druid but reads as though he is historically attested. Dougweller (talk) 08:08, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right. The only historical druid known by name is Diviciacus (Aedui). The rest of the "historical or legendary druids" listed are clearly legendary. Work to be done. --Nicknack009 (talk) 16:14, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]