Talk:List of disasters on the Severn

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Drownings

Is it really necessary to list individual drownings? Tragic, but hardly notable. – Tivedshambo (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the absense of any discussion, I've removed a number of non-notable drowning incidents. – Tivedshambo (talk) 16:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scope

How is the River Severn and the Severn Estuary being defined for this article? What about "disasters" in the Bristol Channel? Would HMS Montagu (1901) on Lundy in 1906 or the scuttling of the Nightingale in 1747 on the island be included? What about various Flat_Holm#Shipwrecks on Flat Holm? Should there be a link to List of shipwrecks in the Bristol Channel and some agreement about what falls into each one?— Rod ^talk 12:22, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I'd say that the Second Severn Bridge should be the cut-off point. Upstream being the Severn, downstream being the Severn Estuary, which would mean the above mentioned incidents are not covered. Mjroots (talk) 04:28, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caersws 1868

It seems there have been two attempts to write this entry. I have a source which varies from both of those:

The driver was killed, too, when an engine was derailed at Caersws in 1868, due to part of the embankment being washed away.

Kidner, R.W. (1992) [1954]. The Cambrian Railways. The Oakwood Library of Railway History (2nd ed.). Headington: Oakwood Press. p. 82. ISBN 0 85361 439 3. OL55.

No mention of a bridge collapse, nor of the fireman being killed. If the fireman had died, that would have been mentioned since the paragraph deals with staff fatalities: the preceding sentence (Abermule 1861) has "both footplate men were killed", and the succeeding sentence (Friog 1883) begins "Once again driver and fireman were killed". Kidner is generally a WP:RS. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:36, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But then again...

the Severn ... rose in flood in February 1868 so quickly that the driver of an early morning up goods train found, when descending the long gradient from Talerddig to beyond Carno, that the floodwater was almost up to the footplate, and well on the way to putting out the fire. But it did not, and the wooden bridge over the Severn at Caersws was found to be holding, so the train reached its destination at Newtown safely. On the return journey, however, when the train was gingerly approaching the bridge along its approach embankment, the engine suddenly toppled right over. Although the bridge remained sound, floodwater had scoured away the embankment. Driver and fireman were killed.

Ransom, P.J.G. (2001). Snow, Flood and Tempest: Railways & Natural Disasters. Hersham: Ian Allan. p. 106. ISBN 0 7110 2833 8. 0111/B2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

So, which is correct? --Redrose64 (talk) 09:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ransom's account makes more sense. It could be more accurate due to further research in the 50-odd years since Kidner's book was published. Mjroots (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, the best source would be newspapers published in the area at the time. Anyone in that area who cares to make a trip to the library? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjroots (talk • contribs) 07:16, 20 May 2010

Found another:

For similar reasons [freak storms] the old Cambrian Railway had its troubles on its route through the mountains of central Wales between Moat Lane and Machynlleth. On one occasion a sudden flood undermined the approach embankment to the bridge over the Severn at Caersws during the night, causing the wreck of an early morning goods train and the death of the engine crew.

Rolt, L.T.C.; Kichenside, Geoffrey (1982) [1955]. "Bridge Failures - Storm and Tempest". Red for Danger (4th ed.). Newton Abbot: David & Charles. p. 106. ISBN 0 7153 8362 0.

Not really much, but we were asked to check Red for Danger. --Redrose64 (talk) 12:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of disasters on the Severn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060215083840/http://www.rssb.co.uk/pdf/reports/research/impact%20of%20scour%20and%20flood%20risk%20on%20railway%20structures.pdf to http://www.rssb.co.uk/pdf/reports/research/impact%20of%20scour%20and%20flood%20risk%20on%20railway%20structures.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of disasters on the Severn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of disasters on the Severn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100617203601/http://www.thehampstallinn.com/about.html to http://www.thehampstallinn.com/about.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]