Talk:List of current National Football League consecutive playoff appearances
The contents of the List of current National Football League consecutive playoff appearances page were merged into NFL playoffs#NFL playoff appearances on 24 December 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 December 2021. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Superbowl XL
[edit]Someone put the victory by the Seattle. I changed it to pittsburgh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.229.160.121 (talk) 19:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Haha, thats funny. Well, the victory should actually go to the Referees & Jerome Bettis.
Recent Figures
[edit]Obviously, this set of records does not take into account of past "streaks". For example, look at the 49ers -- 16 straight 10+ win seasons. KyuuA4 04:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand this part of the page. How is it possible that NE has 6 seasons with 8+ wins then it says 7 seasons with 9+ wins. And the colts 5 consecutive 8+ seasons, 6 consecutive 9+ wins. It doesn't make sense.64.203.19.96 (talk) 12:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Ok the figures section should be completely re-written/updated when the season is over. The problem was people were only updating parts of the Recent figures. If someone updates the 9+ wins they should also update the 8+ wins.64.203.19.96 (talk) 12:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
I noticed the Steelers streaks were not even close to reality, and not just because it wasn't updated at the completion of a recent season. I changed the streaks for the Steelers, but I suspect that other teams may also be off and that this page needs a drastic overhaul. Mickeyg13 (talk) 07:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
It also seems that the Seahawks streak of playoff appearances from 2003-2007 as 5 seasons was omitted. Also, they had two runs of 2 seasons '83-'84 and '87-'88. Even though they aren't headline teams these were great accomplishments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.98.38 (talk) 05:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
I have updated the list to include the run Oakland/Los Angeles had between 1965 and 1986. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illinoisct (talk • contribs) 04:22, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
The Consecutive Wins section should only contain the longest such streak for any given team for each win total. Teams like the Bears list every two year streak when longer streaks are also listed for the Bears in the same win section. The Bills reflect the approach I recommend, someone needs to cull the others.
I've fixed the Redskins per the last comment. Also, one season is not a "streak." HappyJake (talk) 11:18, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Overhaul
[edit]It looks like this article is documenting all winning season streaks in the second half. I thought this was a page for current streaks? If that is the case, the information about past streaks is irrelevant; shouldn't it be removed? Simplebutpowerful 15:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I added the longest wins+ streaks for each team subject to the categories and season streak that already existed and removed any duplicates from each section. I also added a section for current wins+ streaks to track and add to the longest streaks when appropriate. I also added the references for each team listed (Lions, Bengals, Texans did not have any streaks listed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.163.24.33 (talk) 16:22, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Nice. Yes, that's just what I was picturing. Much more organized! Simplebutpowerful 22:08, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Article name?
[edit]The content of the article does not exactly hold true to the article's title about playoff appearances, for it dives into statistics such as regular-season streaks of accomplishment. Nor does the article even hold true to current info, for it contains much about past streaks. I like the content that is there; I don't think any of it needs removing, I just think it needs to go under a better heading. What if we rename the article to something like, "List of National Football League streaks of accomplishment"? Simplebutpowerful 02:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Tables
[edit]I like the new tables! One suggestion, though - instead of the full names of teams in the tables, to save space, how about we put a standardized two- or three-letter abbreviation? That would help with teams such as "New England Patriots", which have a lot of those short, high-win streaks. Simplebutpowerful 07:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Packers
[edit]Can someone add the Packers to the 12+ win season list. They went 12 and 4, first season. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.15.25.104 (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Done 22:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Current consecutive playoff appearances table?
[edit]How about we set up a table for the current consecutive playoff appearances? Every other list in the article, current and all-time, is in table form. It'll also help clarify which streaks are ending, starting, continuing, etc. Simplebutpowerful 01:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of current National Football League consecutive playoff appearances. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150820074438/http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nwe/ to http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/nwe/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)