This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy articles
What are the reasons for the periods when there was no count?
The sheer number of counts -- the property shifting hands in several cases before the death of the count -- the county was a "white elephant" of some sort?
According to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry on Hubert de Burgh, 1st Earl of Kent, he was made Count of Mortain by John I of England, presumably around the time John became king. I think he would therefore belong on this list, and the entry for John should probably be changed, since the title wouldn't have been lost to France until 1204, when much of John's possessions in France were lost. But if Hubert were added, should he be listed under English counts, in which case he would be the lone entry before the 1400s? Or would it be tidier to place him right after John under Norman counts? The problem with that may be that he wasn't actually Norman. Jbening (talk) 05:51, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've finally added him to the list, and I see that de Burgh was in fact an Anglo-Norman name, so he does belong among the Norman counts. Jbening (talk) 02:55, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Agrciolae. I don't have strong feelings about this, but there's a discussion at Talk:Hubert de Burgh, 1st Earl of Kent that documents why I myself eventually backed down on the claim that he was ever Count of Mortain, Norman or not. It hinges on interpretation of wording in his biography, and on how great an achievement that County would have been relative to other titles he was given. Jbening (talk) 18:33, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing out the other discussion. I agree, now, that ODNB was referring to Herbert serving John when John was Count of Mortain, so I self-reverted. Agricolae (talk) 23:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]