Talk:List of conversion units of the Royal Air Force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of conversion units of the Royal Air Force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War II / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitiled

I think this warrants expansion to include all "Conversion Units" and a re-name to Royal Air Force Conversion Units, any objections? i shall go ahead and do it as it as always reversiblePetebutt (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the amalgamation, took me all weekend and this morning!!!!!!!! The slightly odd layout is to stop the RAF Lists box interfering with the Table. Maybe someone has some idea how to do it differently? I have left all links for every reference so anybody will not have to search for the first mention to be able to open that items article. The same goes for the units, which don't appear to have any articles, or is it that I have the wrong titles?Petebutt (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having difficulty with the table. Is there a glitch in the code or am i c**king it up somehow. I've tried all sorts and still get two or three entries without lines between them. HELP!!!!!!!Petebutt (talk) 10:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

realise that most of these units will not get bigger articles than stubs. I will re-direst them to this page as a caretaker and stop any redlink removalPetebutt (talk) 01:53, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]