Talk:List of concertos for cor anglais

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical music: Compositions

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Rename

Shouldn't this be moved to "List of cor anglais concertos", (a) because "cor anglais" is the usual name, and (b) to avoid being taken to mean "...horn concertos by English composers"? Rothorpe (talk) 16:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am inclined to agree, but for slightly different reasons. "Cor anglais" is the usual name in most English-speaking countries, but not in the United States. This problem has been discussed ad nauseam over on Talk:Cor anglais, where periodically American-biased editors have insisted that no-one in the entire English-speaking world calls the instrument "cor anglais". This has, I think, been laid to rest, since that article was originally written in UK English—the criterion for making decisions in most cases were region-neutral language is impossible to achieve. My argument for changing the title of the present article is precisely that the parent article is titled Cor anglais, not English horn. Your second point is perfectly valid, but points to an additional defect in the present title, which is the lack of a necessary hyphen in a unit modifier: in order to avoid just the confusion you point out, it should have been "List of English-horn concertos". One way or the other, the present title is untenable.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If "List of English-horn concertos" is grammatically correct and avoids confusion, let's move it there, but a move to Cor Anglais concertos seems inappropriate for a variety of reasons. Two of the most compelling ones are:

WP:ENGLISH's first guideline for a title's name is to use the term most common in English. There is no competition here. Google hits are an order of magnitude more common for EH than for CA (EH concerto 150,000, concerto for EH 81,200; CA concerto 15,900, concerto for CA 9,520). Googling books gives a 4:1 ratio.

Being a Dutch person used to play the "alto oboe", I created the article apparently in American English. As Jerome admits, the main reason that the page on the instrument is called cor anglais is WP:ENGVAR's section Retaining the existing variety, which applies here equally. Afasmit (talk) 03:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to raise a point---only to discover that I had already raised it, and there were two detailed replies! Thanks and apologies. (I know my watchlist is too big.) I've changed the text examples to 'English-horn concertos', and agree that the article should be similarly renamed. Rothorpe (talk) 00:50, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Either that, or the article content should be changed to reflect the fact that the title refers to horn concertos from England ;-).—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:23, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the page to "List of concertos for English horn" to avoid the confusion. Wish that people had stuck with the original and much more romantic "angel's horn". Afasmit (talk) 04:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of concertos for English horn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]