This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Instead of the long list of references at the top of the article, it would be more useful if you showed, in each section of the article, what references were used for that section or for a particular work listed. See WP:INCITE for more information. -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well done, Albionmusic, for your singlehanded efforts in this page. I am here because I was thinking you could better put the dozen or so principal references you listed (in the lead) into a References section near the end (not sure either before or after the Notes section). Ssilvers has a good suggestion too. The introductory paraqraph in the lead seems appropriate here. P0mbal (talk) 10:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
