Talk:List of cities surrounded by another city

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

redundancy

Norwood, Ohio, surrounded by Cincinnati, Ohio

In every case listed, the inner and outer cities are of the same State. (A counterexample would be surprising.) So why explicitly name the State twice?

Which is preferable?

Norwood, Ohio, surrounded by Cincinnati

Norwood, surrounded by Cincinnati, Ohio

I favor the latter, as a natural progression from smallest to largest. —Tamfang (talk) 22:07, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cities with water boundaries?

Should cities that have all land boundaries surrounded by another city, but have access to a body of water as well count? Example Beaux Arts Village is surrounded on 3 sides by Bellevue, but has access to a lake. BhamBoi (talk) 01:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO I think that counts, but it should always be noted explicitly if that is the case. Almccon (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but that adds a fair amount of subjectivity... Does a town at the end of a peninsula that only has a land boundary with another place count? In the Case of Beaux Arts Village / Bellevue, the city is surrounded on 3 sides, but how much of it can touch water until it doesn't count as surrounded? BhamBoi (talk) 02:39, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per this: Does Watch Hill count, as it only touches Westerly, thus it's only boundary, even if it is only on one side? I don't think so, but again it's subjective... BhamBoi (talk) 02:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreement on Austin City Boundaries

I was trying to find cities to add to this list, so I looked at Austin, Texas to see what cities it surrounds. The map of municipal boundaries from Travis County government shows Austin's boundaries stopping short of Lost Creek and Barton Creek. The problem arises when you look at the municipal maps from City of Austin themselves. They depict the city boundaries reaching out to encircle Lost Creek and Barton Creek, thus making them eligible to be added to this list. But as the County and City seem to have different available data on the city limits of Austin, I don't know which one is correct. Google Maps uses the boundaries defined by the city (surrounding the two aforementioned cities).

Link to Travis County (showing Austin not surrounding them) https://tnr-traviscountytx.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/TravisCountyTX::municipal-jurisdictions-boundaries/explore?location=30.316622%2C-97.727000%2C11.02

Link to City of Austin (showing Austin surrounding them) https://maps.austintexas.gov/GIS/CouncilDistrictMap/

Google Maps: (Using City of Austin defined boundaries)

The Travis County map says it was updated in March 9 2022, and I found a news article [https://communityimpact.com/austin/central-austin/city-county/2021/09/15/updated-draft-map-of-austins-redrawn-city-council-boundaries-ready-for-community-review/] saying that the boundaries from City of Austin are from September 2021. The boundaries published on the County website are supposedly newer based off the publication date, but the boundaries from City of Austin are still currently available here. https://www.austintexas.gov/department/gis-and-maps

Anyone able to provide any insight on whether of not Austin surrounds Lost Creek, Texas, and Barton Creek, Texas? Thanks in advance. BhamBoi (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lost Creek, Texas links a boundary map in references, but it won't load. Does anyone know if there is a Census Data map to settle this? The towns have areas listed from the Census, so I would assume they know the boundaries. BhamBoi (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Solved!

https://data.census.gov/cedsci/map?g=1600000US4805000 (Official Census area data for Austin) says yes, the city boundaries are extended. BhamBoi (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unincorporated Communities?

There are unincorporated parcels of land within Orange, California: Orange Park Acres, California, El Modena, California, and Olive, California. They are their own distinct communities that are not in the jurisdiction of Orange City, but still are not incorporated as their own municipalities. Should they be included?

Listed by the County Gov't as 'Unincorporated Orange County' https://data-ocpw.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/60119fce76d74dc08c3aa455f34b2b4d/explore BhamBoi (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added these three BhamBoi (talk) 09:10, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

removed unincorporated communities. BhamBoi (talk) 03:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important question about the scope of this list

I have been adding every place that appears on the census maps, but that includes all incorporated places and unincorporated CDPs. I have also included some unincorporated places that have defined boundaries within an area, but I have noticed that another editor removed some unincorporated places that I added to the list. Should these places remain on the list? I think it is important because these places still have boundaries so can be confirmed to be surrounded by the other place, and often have have some sort of their own identity so that they can definitely be recognized as a distinct place. Especially the unincorporated CDPs should stay, because they are legally recognized and people from there may likely still have some identity to their place, regardless of their incorporation status. The only concern I have is that the name of the article may need to change and/or have an opening paragraph explaining that all communities with defined boundaries that are surrounded by another can be included.

User:SounderBruce pinging because of your edit. BhamBoi (talk) 18:13, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The more I think about this, I'm conflicted.

On one hand, they are definitely places and they have distinct, defined, boundaries, and they are usually a distinct settlement. But they are unincorporated. That partially goes against the title of this list, which specifies a city. I'm not sure the average reader would notice or know, though. Many CDPs are often their own settlement that functions as its own place with mailing addresses and boundaries, but no government. Again, any consensus? BhamBoi (talk) 21:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

removed unincorporated communities. BhamBoi (talk) 03:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

overlap

I wonder how much this list overlaps with List of enclaves and exclaves. Is there a good reason not to merge? —Tamfang (talk) 04:34, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]