Talk:List of ciphertexts

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Criterion for notability

As someone who maintains a list of "Famous Unsolved Codes" [1], I'd like to start a discussion to head off a future problem. Specifically, if my own email queue is any indication, there are going to be many people who write their own codes, and then try to list them on this page as a "famous ciphertext". So, do we want to try to come up with some sort of minimum standard for listing here? Or will it be sufficient just for a ciphertext to already have its own article elsewhere on Wikipedia? I'd recommend something like a minimum number of mentions in respected cryptographic press or reference works. Otherwise this list is going to get polluted by a lot of snake oil in short order. Or do we want that, in order to have a comprehensive list? I can go either way, I just strongly recommend having a clearly stated set of standards, because I know how aggressive some of the "code spammers" are going to be once they find this page. --Elonka 03:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that a necessary, although maybe not sufficient, criterion is that the ciphertext must have been published or discussed in some respectable, notable publication. — Matt Crypto 17:54, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

At minimum, the ciphertext must be ones that has their own article on Wikipedia. —Lowellian (reply) 06:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Dorabella.gif

The image File:Dorabella.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why is this a distinct page from 'famous ciphertexts' on Ciphertext? Jackiespeel (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tamam Shud ciphertext is solved

http://ronja.twibright.com/somerton.php — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.53.146.14 (talk) 23:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That link just gives a long list of guesses made by filling in arbitrary letters, not any actual solutions. —Lowellian (reply) 17:28, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]