Jump to content

Talk:List of cider brands

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

magners?

katy's?

this page's got holes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.101.83 (talkcontribs)

Umm, Welcome to Wikipedia,

the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit. If content is missing, add it! (Magners is on list but is called Bulmers) Rex the first talk | contribs 23:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foundry Cider (which I think is owned by Guinness, but couldn't find a reference). Also, 3 Hammers is in the list twice under '3' and 'Three' so we probably want to clean that up. 184.70.110.26 (talk) 20:03, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


"Fruit" Ciders

[edit]

We need to distinguish between ciders with fruit juice or flavourings added, and "ciders" made with those fruits. In most cases this isn't a problem - the way Kopparberg make their "cranberry cider" is obvious - but how do we distinguish between "pear cider" and perry? A regular cider drinker should usually be able to work out which is which, but how can we make this clear for the general reader? RomanSpa 23:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

references

[edit]

names w/o articles or references need to go. we are not a directory. all info must be notable and confirmable.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done, the names are in the edit history, if anyone wants to return them with refs.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:26, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work. I'd be tempted to get rid of the one red link remaining because all the reference shows is that it exists, not that it is especially notable, i.e. it is only mentioned in passing on the page. --Bob Re-born (talk) 06:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

clean up needed

[edit]

The list should have no references and no red links. It should just be a list of notable companies, linking to their article in EN WP. The article should take care of references and establishing notability. As it is now it is spamming lots of URLs for NN companies. If there is no opposition, I will clean this up in a few days time). (see List of bean-to-bar chocolate manufacturers as an example of how it should be) -- Alexf(talk) 15:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Last call for comments. The request was posted 20 days ago and not a peep, for or against. Cleanup will be done this week. All entries without an article in EN.WP will be removed. This is not a place for advertisement. If you want a company in the list, write an article. -- Alexf(talk) 11:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexf: I guess this slipped down the back of the sofa all those months ago...? ;) anyway, I think it looks better now- although I left the refs for the time being. Great minds (eventuallly!) think alike! — fortunavelut luna 03:04, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In a way. It is still in my list of things to do, but RL gets in the way. Good job. -- Alexf(talk) 11:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Them honey-dos, eh?  ;) Thanks! — fortunavelut luna 11:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]