Talk:List of casinos in Oregon

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

Expansion

Not sure how reliable the source is, but this page also lists Kla-Mo-Ya Casino and The Mill Casino Hotel. --Another Believer _(Talk) 01:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So is the current state of this list all it will ever be? I am wondering how it can be improved/expanded. Is any one aware of former casinos? Pictures? References? If not, is it worth considering a merge with Gambling in Oregon, where the table can be incorporated with other information about gambling in Oregon? By the way, Katr67, thanks for your work with expanding the table--looks much better than before! --Another Believer _(Talk) 05:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the table is set up to deal with references. A few of the state ones do have references. The Nevada one includes a reference for the districts since they are state controlled, but it only appears in the state table and not the US one. If you have references, they can be included in the comments section. Yes, pictures can help, and right now they can go in the comments. If you want to make changes to the layout, that should be discussed at Talk:List of casinos in the United States. You can include the list in Gambling in Oregon if you desire, I'll show you how to do that if you need help. Vegaswikian (talk) 16:32, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As to former casinos, these were in the US list at one time, but someone decided that this was not appropriate. It is easy to add a second list in the Oregon one if that is desired. Just include the heading and the data in the no include data at the bottom. Vegaswikian (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vegas, I appreciate your response. And I mean NO disrespect by this, but I was actually referring to the article itself as opposed to just that table. My fault for not clarifying. My intention was to question other members of WikiProject Oregon if there were other ways we could help to expand this article. I am not looking to change the layout of the table, but I appreciate your comments--that information helps for future reference. :) Any one else have thoughts? --Another Believer _(Talk) 01:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note about reversion

I just gotta say that it seemed pretty reasonable to remove the "State" field from the table (i.e. a "bad" edit). There's no indication that the list is transcluded to List of casinos in the United States so it looks kinda silly since the list title already indicates that the casinos are in Oregon. I happened to take a look at that list and figured out what what going on. I have no idea why we need duplicate lists in 51 different places, but I won't argue. I do have a quibble with having several good faith edits completely reverted. It would have been simple enough to restore the "State" field and leave the other "good" edits, I think. Anyway, I have done so. Hopefully this more complete list is no longer a problem. Katr67 (talk) 04:57, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These were actually in one list and another editor started removing them from the complete list into a disconnected list for each state. I found that useless. So the current arrangement is a compromise. The edits today were the first that removed the state, it was not a problem that I anticipated. If someone has the time, adding a comment to the top of each page warning about this may be a solution. The better solution is to include all of the top code in a template that is included in the state articles. That way there is only one copy of the top code. Yes, it would have been nice to add the changes back in, but I simply did not have the time. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting this page

@MB298: Why do you think this page still needs to exist, when the same content exists in a nicer form and with more context in Gambling in Oregon? Toohool (talk) 17:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Toohool: I feel there should at least be some sort of a merge discussion before redirecting. MB298 (talk) 17:51, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of discussion is not a reason to revert if you don't actually disagree with the edit. But here we are. What do you think? Toohool (talk) 21:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]