This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
For Silvermine River Bridge, an editor changed "Original 1938 bridge replaced Not on NRHP " to "Original 1938 bridge replaced No longer on NRHP ", i.e. implying the bridge was once NRHP-listed and then was delisted. I see no evidence for that. I used an Elkman-supplied tool to search for NRHP listings, including properties that have been delisted, and do not find this item. Is the change introducing fabrication or what? I am getting P.O.'d with the particular editor adding stuff with no sources. Since the U.S. National Register was not started until 1965, while the bridge was demolished earlier according to a HAER record that I had uncovered and this editor pasted into this article, i believe it's just fabrication, reaching a false conclusion. doncram (talk) 06:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The "no longer on NRHP" phrasing is indeed incorrect. This should be changed to "not on NRHP" as this is not listed as a contributing property. --Polaron | Talk13:47, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
