Talk:List of bomber aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Fighter/bombers, wherefore art thou?

Why aren't fighter/bombers listed here? Perhaps, this list should be called Strategic Bombers rather than just Bombers.

The Stuka is listed but not the Me-262, the first jet-powered fighter/bomber. (The British were designing a jet fighter of their own and actually had them into a production, tho, like its German counterpart, it saw little action.) Originally designed as an interceptor/fighter, Hitler insisted it be modified to carry bombs (as he did most German fighters). A very fortunate thing for the Allies during Overlord!

If there's an article on the Me-262, I'm going to add it to the list of German bombers.

PainMan 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is a bomber?

It is a fairly simple question with a rather complex answer! There are many different types of bombers such as level bomber, torpedo bomber and dive bombers. Also some aircraft are classified as attack aircraft but are technically bombers. So far there isn't any differentiation to the bomber list. Idsnowdog (talk) 01:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on production numbers in lists

There is an RfC discussion on numbers of aircraft built in lists. You are invited to join in. Please do, as an editor has been attempting to add or restore them here. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fokker F-27 maritime

The Fokker F-27 maritime isn't a bomber, it's a patrol aircraft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.187.64.155 (talk) 23:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List format

Following this discussion on the Aviation WikiProject talk page, this list is to be reformatted to the "general" format as specified at WP:AVILIST. Note that the general format now retains the count of numbers built. If you have any objections to the format in principle, please raise them in the linked discussion. If you believe that this list should be an exception, please seek a local consensus on this talk page. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 16:08, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plane

First time is 4 years 64.72.36.107 (talk) 19:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]