Talk:List of biographical dictionaries of women writers in English

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

suggested move

I suggest the title be moved to "List of biographical dictionaries of female writers" ("female" is an adjective whereas "women" isn't). -- TyrS chatties 03:54, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Light Oppose. Sorry, I'm against this because most of those biographies use the word Women, which I happen to find more elegant, for that matter. Even though you are right about the nature of those words and I think I spotted a (recent?) debate about this issue somewhere on Wp. Female is more usually adjective. However, to use 2 nouns in apposition is perfectly as acceptable from a syntactic point of view. Hope you’ll agree^[1].Greetings,--Lee P. (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

note

^ See this advice on Dailywritingtips You’ll very easily find the opposite opinion, too, I believe, as well as the choice of the wording with Female on WP. This NYTimes article goes perhaps a bit further.

Why limited to writers in English?

Here are two books about Spanish writers:

Regards. emijrp (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of biographical dictionaries of women writers in English. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070202194505/http://www.bc.edu/libraries/research/guides/s-irishwomen/ to http://www.bc.edu/libraries/research/guides/s-irishwomen/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:51, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] See this advice on Dailywritingtips You’ll very easily find the opposite opinion, too, I believe, as well as the choice of the wording with Female on WP. This NYTimes article goes perhaps a bit further.

[1]