Talk:List of best-selling music artists in Finland

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland Mid‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

No Beatles?

They probably sold their most records in the time that the coverage in the sales was not that comprehensive (in Finland). Though, their first gold album in Finland was 1 in the 2000s only. 85.217.32.182 (talk) 00:09, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, dig through the database: no Beatles. :D Weird, but that's probably the most reliable or at least most accurate sales source for Finland, so we have to stick to it. -- Frous (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting, still not much sales data exists for The Beatles in Poland, yet #1 went to the album chart top spot there, so must have been gig in their lifetime there also. Same can be said for AC/DC, but they appear in the "Bands" list, although have sold enough for the overall list. Think I'll add them in later.

Sales under certification levels included

Hi, IMO, the record sales below certifications should equally be included in the totals. The uncertified figures come from the exactly same and therefore exactly as reliable a source, Musiikkituottajat, so I see no reason not to include those sales if that inclusion is clearly stated in the article. -- Puisque (talk) 06:11, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]