Talk:List of beaches in San Diego County

California: Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

San Diego Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Suggestion

Wouldn't this be more interesting if the article was expanded to cover "Beaches in San Diego County, California]]?

Also: As the article currently exists, it probably fits under the guidelines at WP:NOT, so I wouldn't be surprised if someone tried to PROD or AFD it. ^Blank ^Verse 12:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not think that is necessary. There is already a California State Beaches article that lists all beaches by county. I made this article to link to off of San Diego's article, so it should be beaches with-in city limits. If you want one for the whole county, there should be another article created. At least that is what I think. -ChristopherMannMcKay 18:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Beach

Shouldn't Imperial Beach be included as one of San Diego beaches.158.35.225.230 18:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Also, since there are beaches mentioned that are in the towns outside of San Diego, might as well list them all the way up to Oceanside Beach.158.35.225.230 18:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are no "beaches mentioned that are in the towns outside of San Diego" listed on this article, that is why Imperial Beach is not listed, beacuse it is not a beach with-in San Diego city limits. I do not believe this article should cover beaches in San Diego County beacuse California State Beaches article that lists all beaches by county. —Christopher Mann McKay 18:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the California State Beaches article only covers State Beaches, there are only a very few of those, that list is not by any means a list of all the beaches in California, which would be many times as long. State Beaches are sort of like State Parks. The term does not simply mean a beach in the State of California. Invertzoo (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We also have an article "List of California beaches". That list is not complete or detailed, but I guess it is a useful overview of the general topic. Invertzoo (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to "Be Bold"

And so... I reworked this article and fixed it up quite a lot. I think it looks a lot better in several ways, for example before it had no references at all. I dismantled the gallery, found some better images and matched them to the listings. Tomorrow I can add references for the second list. Invertzoo (talk) 00:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much all fixed up now, at least for the time being. Invertzoo (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:59, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:USPLACE and WP:NCGN. Note to the closing admin that the edit history on both target pages need to be preserved for attribution. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:16, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

weak support though I don't really see an advantage. Greg Kaye 13:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support so long as WP:CONCISE remains policy Red Slash 20:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support both. No need to unnecessarily disambiguate, especially as inconsistently as this with one having state and the other country. Zarcadia (talk) 22:40, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support both, San Diego redirects to the city in California, and not to the other locations named San Diego per WP:PRIMARYUSAGE; same goes for Sydney. Therefore, list should follow this naming.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 04:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:CONPRIME. bd2412 T 18:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of beaches in San Diego. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071003012554/http://www.visitusa.com/california/beaches/sandiego-beaches.htm to http://www.visitusa.com/california/beaches/sandiego-beaches.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]