Talk:List of ancient legal codes

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

a thought

Maybe these codes should by layed out in the order that they occured. Sorry about grammer & the such I am typing this on an iPod —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krj373 (talk • contribs) 08:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes chronological order would be way more useful. Shall I go ahead and do that? Bhny (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ancient legal codes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908205713/http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/hammint.htm to http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/hammint.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sharia and Halacha

Neither of these are a single code but legal systems, as varied and extensive as secular ones, and they are living systems, sages are still making new Halacha and new Sharia on a daily basis. In this regard they are also not really ancient, only having ancient roots. Maybe their fundamental documents could be added, depending on the definition of ancient.--Nngnna (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yassa Law, Possible Additions and Defined Parameter of the page

I was wondering if Mongol Yassa Law would count as an addition to this page.

However I see two potential issues with this. First, it dates to the 13th century meaning it could not be classed as ancient. I say this in reference to the Wikipedia article “ancient history” that defines the definition of ancient between 3000BC-500AD.

Secondly, would Yassa be defined as a Legal Code? I’m having a little trouble defining the difference between the Ancient Legal Codes mentioned and Customary Legal Systems listed on the Wikipedia article “Customary Law”

For example “Early Irish Law” is present on both pages.

I’m curious if Customary Legal Codes (like those on the Customary Law page” with extended histories (such as Albanian Kanun) that trace quite a lengthy history, should be included?

Perhaps there should be a mention of Customary Law to navigate to from this page?

Another aspect is whether or not the code is still practiced or not.

This may be an important distinction between the likes of Early Irish Law which is no longer practiced versus Albanian Kanun which is. With this question in mind would Yassa be worthy of inclusion to this Ancient Legal Codes list due to it being a historic legal code and not a contemporary one?

Perhaps its historic relevance, being the legal code of the Mongol Empire would be cause for its inclusion?

It could be that more articles need to be created to list legal codes that fall between the gaps of both Customary Legal Systems and Ancient Legal Code.

It could be said that Yassa should be included in the category section of “Category:Medieval legal codes” but considering the definition of medieval is 500-1500AD this could mean clipping off a few of the last entries on this article. Ghoulgamesh (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]