Talk:List of ammonite genera

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of ammonite genera article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

List of ammonite genera is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 5, 2008	Featured list candidate	Not promoted
January 5, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Former featured list candidate

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cephalopods (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Naming conventions and terminology

Couldn't the rather lengthy discussion on naming conventions and terminology be left to a relevant page on taxonomy rather than taking up unnecessary space here. It seems that very brief statements regarding included concerns would suffice.

I'll be working up a simplifation in the next week or so, pending comment, either here or on my talk page user talk:J.H.McDonnell

Regards, John J.H.McDonnell 3/3/09 —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.H.McDonnell (talk • contribs) 13:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of ammonite genera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of ammonite genera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927185417/http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2041/Pages%20993-999.pdf to http://palaeontology.palass-pubs.org/pdf/Vol%2041/Pages%20993-999.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Left handed chirality shells in lead image

I've noticed in the lead image that a lot of the shells are drawn with a left hand handed chirality. Apparently for the sake of making the image symmetrical.

As I understand it, left handed chirality in shelled animals, or in natural spiral structures in general is rather rare. So, it stands to reason that unless this was drawn from museum samples, where they would conceivably have a large collection with a lot of variation.

Alternatively, I realize that ammonite fossils are very common. So, it stands to reason the picture was drawn from their own samples.

I'm not necessarily saying the picture is inaccurate. Cephalopods can certainly have left handed shells. Though I can't speak specifically for ammonites, I don't see why they would be an exception.

I've just been studying chirality in nature, and the odd fact that most spiral structures are right handed. Even manmade ones, for some reason we favour right handed spirals. But I loved the idea, because you only ever hear of chirality in the context of chemistry. But once you learn it applies to all spirals, you see it everywhere. I always have to check the handedness of every spiral I see now that I know. 2607:FEA8:99E0:61D0:9502:D3E3:318B:AD47 (talk) 22:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]