This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
I have tagged William Fawkener's entry in the list as dubious, because the ODNB biography of Charles Whitworth, 1st Earl Whitworth clearly indicates that he was ambassador until 1800. Fawkener does not have a biography in it, but googling indicates that he did exist and may have been in Russia at the embassy at the time in question. This suggests that he may have been secretary to the legation (or such like) and charge d'affaires when Whitworth left. This matter needs to be resolved. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed this tag. It looks to me as if Fawkener was sent on a short term (perhaps secret) mission, making him a special envoy, not an ambaasador. He appears to have been a clerk to the Privy Council until at least 1797, but occasionally employed on diplomatic missions. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An editor who has not had the courtesy to log in so that the rest of can identify him/her has gone through this article changing the style of ambassadors etc to the final title that they held, which will frequently have been awarded AFTER they were ambassador, etc. This is TOTALLY inappropriate. The article should use the title by which the person was known while ambassador. This is the consistent practice with articles such as this. Though it will be a retrograde step, I will revert the recent changes wholesale unless the article is changed back so that the appropriate titles are used, not later ones. However, I would appreciate commetns before I do so. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]