This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
The United Kingdom and Great Britain are basically the same state, I suggest that this be somehow merged with the UK list of ambassadors to Paris. --RJR3333 (talk) 18:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I respectfully disagree. The United Kingdom and Great Britain are fundamentally different - for instance, Great Britain never included any part of Ireland. In my view, the heads of missions to France before the creation of the UK do not belong on a page which includes 'United Kingdom' in its title. Moonraker (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well in a merged article we could still point out the difference between the Kingdom of Great Britain and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, having three separate articles for each successor state seems ridiculous to me. --RJR3333 (talk) 21:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the difference between England, Scotland, and Great Britain is large, but not the difference between Great Britain and the UK. Scotland was an independent kingdom until 1707, Ireland was just a British colony. And it didn't play a substantial role in UK politics until the 1820s. Also are we going to then create a separate article about the UK of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's ambassadors to France? --RJR3333 (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
On a point of detail, Ireland was not a British colony, although its limited degree of self-government did not go so far as the sending of ambassadors. When you say "it didn't play a substantial role in UK politics until the 1820s", the very creation of the UK was the fall-out of the Irish Rebellion of 1798. Moonraker (talk) 02:43, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]