Talk:List of airports by IATA airport code: A

This alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

"comments added to prevent addition of incorrect IATA codes" was wrong

All pages contained "ZZZ is FAA code (not IATA for ..." comments, but these were wrong at many cases. If the FAA code is only 3-letter code and no same IATA code, the comment is right, but the same code points to different airport is actually very common case. For example, IATA code of Bahía Negra Airport is BFA, and FAA code of Boyne Mountain Airport is BFA. - Hhswp (talk) 21:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So in such situations the hidden comment is surely useful to minimise the risk of confusion, surely? --David Biddulph (talk) 22:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sudden deletion was my runaway, sorry. I thought the better way to prevent mistakes is to add column FAA, and I had a plan to it (and I'm preparing), so I'd deleted. - Hhswp (talk) 22:18, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To check all codes, and to prepare to add FAA column, I made simple csvdata. I also suspect people are confused FAA code as IATA code, and these listing pages may contain this kind of mistakes. (At least, List_of_airports_by_IATA_code and List_of_airports_by_ICAO_code had many wrong code that I found.) - Hhswp (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improve or remove Time/DST columns of List of airports by IATA?

First, inconsistencies between pages are the problem. Because the "A-N" pages have these, the "M-Z" pages should also have these.

Secondly, we will not be able to adjust the clock with the only month of the DST. For example, in New York on 2016, DST began on March 13, it will end on November 6.

Third, it is too heavy to maintain the DST columns. For example, Egyptian government took the decision to cancel the DST on 2014. I suspect that we can't update continuously the DST columns, without infra for automatic maintainance.

Fourth, it is clear that "List of airports by IATA" have no responsibility to show the information for "adjusting clock".

My proposals have three options.

Remove time/DST columns.
Build custom module to show current DST information (for example, with collaborating some kind of external service).
Show only timezone names, like "Africa/Casablanca".

Third option's decision is the same as "airports.dat" of "openflights", and once we know timezone name, then we can extract UTC offset and DST with using IANA timezone database.

- Hhswp (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

code ABC for Albacete Airport

It is necessary to add the airport code ABC for Albacete Airport (named Los Llanos) in Albacete, Spain. If someone knows how to add it, please do it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.121.242.180 (talk) 01:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

This page need to be cleaned up. Most of the links are either to missing pages, or to disambig pages. The ICAO page is better. -- Jbattersby 22:08, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the links to all the IATA codes and ICAO codes. I had previously done this on 6-Feb-2006, but someone else added them again on 15-Mar-2006. This restores the page to the same format as all the other IATA airport pages. While having the codes linked does makes it easier to add the airports to disambiguation pages or redirect pages, once that is done the links really serve no other purpose. The only remaining "red" links are for airports or cities that don't have pages (yet). I think that is cleaned up enough to warrant removing the CLEANUP template, which I have also done. Zyxw 16:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Country flag templates

In regards to cleaning up the page, any opinions on the use of the country flag templates that display a country's flag before its name? I see these have been added to some of the entries on the list. I think the page would be look better if all the entries used the same format (either with flag or without), but I haven't made any changes yet because I'm still not sure if the flags add any value to the list. Zyxw 16:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think it looks a bit of a mess with the flags all over the place. If it was possible to have all the flags aligned I think that would look good - but I see that the templates include the flag and country name. -- Jbattersby 18:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ADC/KADC Confusion

The IATA page lists ADC and KADC as the IATA and ICAO respective codes standing for Andakombe, Papua New Guniea, while the ICAO lists them as Wadena Municipal Airport in Wadena, Minnesota. Is this just a matter of trying to add logic into it (KADC=ADC, therefore ADC=KADC)? Other sites I've looked at (that weren't based on Wikipedia) state that KADC is only for Wadena, which, if there are no exceptions in the ICAO's formula, fits in the ICAO pattern (K stands for Mainland US airports). But I have no proof from actual IATA or ICAO published lists, so I'm not the one to correct it. Paploo 17:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IATA/FAA Codes

I found that you had listed Atka Airport as AKA. This is the FAA code, while the IATA code for the airport is AKB. I would suggest making notes where there is a discrepancy between the two codes. Paploo 18:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ABC = Albacete, Spain?

AFAIK ABC *is* the IATA code for LEAB (Albacete, Spain). At least Amadeus decodes ABC as Albacete, but I don't have a reference. Why is it listed as incorrect in the article (see comments when you edit Ab section) --Estradin (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Database

Hi,

Do you have a of all those IATA & ICAO codes that I can borrow for personal use? What I need is a spreadsheet with the ICAO code, the IATA code and the airport name in seperate columns.

Best regards, Laurens

—Preceding unsigned comment added by L.maarschalkerweerd (talk • contribs) 17:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

disambig pages

Y'll really should add this data to the various disambig pages, or create dab pages where needed. I'll add to ADV now as an example. Ling.Nut ^(WP:3IAR) 07:58, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of airports by IATA code: A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140504190753/http://www.aerocivil.gov.co/AIS/AIP/AIP%20Generalidades/Aerodromos/04%20AD%201.3.pdf to http://www.aerocivil.gov.co/AIS/AIP/AIP%20Generalidades/Aerodromos/04%20AD%201.3.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]