Talk:List of aircraft of the Royal Flying Corps

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

RFC/RNAS aircraft

Is it intended to differentiate between aircraft operated by the RFC and the RNAS, e.g. by putting the operator(s) in brackets after the aircraft name, or by having two sections in the article or even by having two separate articles? I tnink my preference would be for the first option. Were there any other operators? --TraceyR 14:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I misunderstood the comment that the RFC list "may contain RNAS aircraft"! --TraceyR 18:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a separate List of aircraft of the Royal Naval Air Service, I removed this from the List of aircraft of the Royal Air Force with the intention of removing the RNAS aircraft so this list will be just RFC. MilborneOne 19:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This list seems to contain items added at random

There are several one-off types (like the B.E.1 and S.E.4) that were prototypes tested at the Royal Aircraft Factory, but as far as I know never taken on to RFC charge. Similarly the "prototypes" list should be restricted to prototype aircraft (like the S.E.2) that were used by a squadron. Is this even a case of confusion between RAF (=Royal Aircraft Factory) and RAF (=Royal Air Force)?? In any case, few of the items currently on the (prototypes) list would meet that one.

Before I charge in and take an axe to the list - is this the consensus - or do we mean something like "all British aircraft of the period, whether they were officially RFC property or not"?

This list was originally broken off as a section in the RAF list to better recognise the Royal Flying Corps. It has not really had a good clean-up since with ad-hoc additions. No objection to you having a go but suggest it should really only show aircraft that entered service with the RFC (even if just one aircraft), dont think one of prototypes that did not enter service should be added. Dont agree it should be all British aircraft of the period as that could be misleading as this is the RFC list. MilborneOne (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]