Talk:List of WWE Hardcore Champions/Archive 1

Archive 1

Edge and Foley

Should Edge and Foley be recognized as actual co-WWE Hardcore Champions yet? Nothing has been said to suggest that they are the champions, just that they are sharing ownership of the physical belt. Jeff Silvers 01:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Foley said he was un-retiring the belt, so for now it should stay. Spyke 02:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

I've mentioned it being disputed as I'm more or less feeling the same with Jeff here. WWE.com has not mentioned them in title history or their list of champions along with the fact the RAW recap says "un-retirement" and "co-hardcore champions" in quotation marks implies this isn't an official reign. --Oakster ^(Talk) 07:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Foley's "second reign"

Though the belt was awarded to Foley in 2003, I don't think that constitutes a title reign, so I'm removing that portion from the history. Jeff Silvers 19:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

well it think it should be... esspecially as he is the one the brought the title back to hand it over to Edge... i think it should be dicussed if that is not considered a reign then nor can the Edge thing so it should all be removed --- Paulley 14:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Removed?

They haven't mentione the title in a few weeks and seem to have forgotten about it. Maybe we can remove it now. TJ Spyke 02:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

First defence

The match is declared, by Jerry or JR, to be "under ladder match rules" not TLC. They say this as Bossman walks down the ramp on the segment before that which is linked to.Tony2Times 02:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)