Talk:List of Suits characters

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Travis Tanner

can someone please clear up if Tanner is working for the same law firm when he moves to NYC. Or if he joined a new firm in NYC. Thanks 199.246.39.222 (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pages for Mike, Harvey and Rachel

Any objections to making separate articles for them. I will also post this on the Suits talk page.

Agree entirely. They're bulking-up far too big on the Suits page. Valetude (talk) 15:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me, too. Also, is it just me, or does anyone else feel that Mike's innocence and vulnerability are what made him—and consequently, the whole show—interesting? And that as it progressed, and he became tougher, more jaded, and generally more like all the other lawyers, his character became flat, and the whole show devolved into a soapy merry-go-round of manufactured conflicts? That's certainly the impression I've gotten, watching it over the last few weeks. (To be fair, its creators couldn't have imagined all the episodes would eventually be available at once. Spaced out week-to-week, the change must not have been so obvious. Still, I don't envy them, having to keep such a thing chugging along, season after season, after it'd lost most of its meaning.) Once "Mike" has his own page, do you think it'd be appropriate to add a note about this transition and its effect on the show's quality? It could be of interest to aspiring TV writers—i.e., if you have a central character who's not a self-serving jerk like all the rest, don't turn him into one too, y'know? Just saying. – AndyFielding (talk) 23:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Oh, and we _are_ supposed to start these replies with indent-me colons—even though this mobile version of the editor presents a "Reply" box separate from the rest of the content? How would we know that? – AndyFielding (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2022 (UTC) )[reply]