Jump to content

Talk:List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Greater London

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Greater London is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 13, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted

Ambiguity in enumeration of SSSIs

[edit]

This was the last sentence of this article's first paragraph until a minute before this message was posted:

As of 2007, there are 36 sites designated within this Area of Search, 25 of which have been designated for their biological interest, 11 for their geological interest, and 7 for both biological and geological interest.

As we all know, 25 + 11 = 36. In other words, the sites listed in virtue of both their biological and their geological interest are mentioned twice. Counting the items of the list confirmed this suspicion of mine. It certainly looks like a mistake to me, and I have thus decided to correct it, changing "25" to "18". I find it uncontroversial enough to do it without discussion; if anyone disagrees, please leave a message to my secretary. Waltham, The Duke of 21:24, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes

[edit]

If other editors do not object I propose to make the following changes. 1. Merge the 'hectares' and 'acres' columns into one area column showing both. 2. Merge the 'borough' column with the 'location' column, with the borough shown first to keep the facility to sort on the borough. 3. Delete the 'year notified' column, which is of no interest to most readers. 4. Add an 'Other designations' column. This is usefully included in other lists of SSSIs such as Berkshire.

The merging and deletions of columns should make the list more readable on narrower monitors, and help to make room for the extra column. Any views? Dudley Miles (talk) 16:01, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 34 external links on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Greater London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Greater London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Greater London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Review

[edit]

Tim riley and SchroCat. This is the last of the three SSSI lists I have worked on which were already FLs. Comments again gratefully received. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shall look in over coffee tomorrow morning. A pleasing task for a Sunday morning. Tim riley talk 17:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Precious little from me. This remains a top-notch article in my view, and it was a pleasure (as well as highly instructive) to review it. Only a handful of minor queries:
  • Bentley Priory – I wonder why the capital F in Yorkshire Fog?
  • Chingford Reservoirs – "The reservoirs are majoring wintering grounds" – should this be "major" rather than "majoring"?
  • Hampstead Heath Woods – "The site has many old and over-mature trees, and extensive dead wood which provides a habitat for invertebrates..." – Is this habitat provided by the old and over-mature trees as well as the dead wood? If so, "provides" should be "provide".
  • Mid Colne Valley – "significant" occurs twice in the note here. I have a bee in my bonnet about the word, feeling it is best kept for use when something is actually signified, rather than used as a mere synonym of "important" or "big". (And I have Fowler on my side.)
  • Saltbox Hill – "…and it is one of only two sites in London which has the dark green fritillary butterfly. I think this should be "...which have", as I reckon the subject of the verb is "two sites", not "it", but I may be wrong.
Those are my meagre gleanings; I hope they're of use. Tim riley talk 10:54, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Dudley, I'll be along on the morrow. (I've made a couple of what I think are minor tweaks, and I'll likely do the same again tomorrow; feel free to revert if you think otherwise or feel the original was better). Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This keeps coming up. Wikipedia is random whether designations are capitalised. My view is that it is better to be consistent, and I prefer capitalisation because it signals to the reader that it is an official designation, not just a noun phrase.. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Denham Lock Wood has an error message coming up "Malformed OS grid ref: Malformed numerical part of NGR"
  • FN2 has Natural England in italics, which isn't right
  • FN3: no needs for LONDON in caps
  • FNs 7, 17 and 77 have 2012-03-31 date formats, none of the others do. They also show the archive in a different way to the others. They have "Archived 2012-03-31 at the Wayback Machine"; others have "Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 16 January 2016." The latter is probably the better way to format them.
  • I have not come across this before. The date correction tool does not work on the webarchive template. I have corrected the dates but I will need to look further at how I can get rid of the template. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's it. If this was at FLC, I'd be supporting once those tweaks have been made, so your re-working is as up-to-standard as your other lists. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 11:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Tim riley and SchroCat for your very helpful comments. Replies above. Dudley Miles (talk) 17:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Sites_of_Special_Scientific_Interest_in_Greater_London&oldid=1207136012"