Talk:List of RiffTrax

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Riffers

It seems to me that it would make more sense to list all the riffers for each Rifftrax, not just the "Guest Riffers" (which seems to equal "The Riffers other than Mike Nelson"), since Mike isn't actually present on all the Rifftrax and right now the list is totally unclear on whether he participated or not in any given Rifftrax. I don't know if I'd have the time to go through the list and make the change myself (and I certainly don't object if anyone else wants to), but is there any disagreement with the suggestion? Propaniac (talk) 13:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

iRiffs

Dozens are added to iRiffs each month, it's too much a pain in the butt to even try and list them. Besides, it's like listing fan fiction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.83.36 (talk) 16:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Removed. Mike R (talk) 19:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove sections unless there is a consensus. I disagree that these are on the level of fan fiction. They are being sold by RiffTrax, and are often produced by notable individuals (I.E., Blame Society, That Guy With The Glasses). This is something different. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I made an attempt to shorten the list based upon high sales, overall popularity, relevance of films, or notability of the riffers involved. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Category:RiffTrax films is up for deletion.

Feel free to discuss the Category:RiffTrax films's nomination for deletion here: September 2#Category:RiffTrax films.--DrWho42 (talk) 23:48, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DVD release dates

What source is being used for these? I am convinced they are not all correct. Simple example, Shorts-Tacular Shorts-Stravaganza and Wide World of Shorts are listed as March 2, 2010. However, simply looking back in my email for old promotional messages, I've got an email from RiffTrax asking me to buy them from September 9, 2009. Now, it's possible there was some last-minute six-month delay, but it seems pretty unlikely.

There's also the matter of the ID numbers assigned to movies. Since sometimes they were released on the same day, I've taken to listing them by the Legend Films code given on the spine. For instance, Best of Shorts Volume 1 is LF00488, followed by Night of the Living Dead at LF00489, then Reefer Madness with LF00490. However, if you use the current listed dates, they start to get out of order. LF00492 releases two months before LF00491? LF00509 releases 3 months before LF00497? Just to check one of these, LF00497 is Planet of Dinosaurs, listed as released March 2, 2010. However, on the RiffTrax message board it is announced as available on October 18, 2009.

If I were to correct these, would the dates of the emails or forum posts announcing them for sale be good enough as release dates?

JoshuaJSlone (talk) 01:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Doing more forum/email checking to gather the dates, but thought I'd mention there do seem to be some legitimate cases of the ID numbers being out of order.

67.142.86.177 (talk) 03:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Query about certain titles

There are a number of titles listed in the VOD section which are not available in that format. These include the "three riffers" version of "Reefer Madness", *any* version of "Little Shop", etc. Can anyone confirm these were ever available in that format?

Also, two of the "Three Stooges" titles ("Greatest Routines" and "in Color") are not Rifftrax at all, since they do not feature any commentary. They should be removed. Rhindle The Red (talk) 14:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting date system not working

There seem to be at least three major problems with the system being used to sort dated entries in this article, by including a no-display span element with the ISO date (which can be sorted easily) followed by a displayed U.S.-style date (which cannot). First, some of the pairs of dates don't match. For example, the entry for Red Dawn currently shows:

<span style="display:none">2009-07-18</span>July 2, 2009

This means that the one-click sort scrambles some entries. Second is the cumbersome maintenance issue in having two separate dates that allows error or mischief to create these problems. Third is the lack of citable sources that would permit editors to spot-check and fix these dates.
I think cited sources can be provided by a combination of RiffTrax-website links (which include digital release dates) and mst3kinfo.com pages (which include live-show dates), although these are really primary sources (which are generally frowned upon). Is there perhaps a Mediawiki-markup means to tag a single date to be displayed in U.S. (or user-selected) format other than using unnecessary and distracting wiki-links? ~ Jeff Q (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of RiffTrax. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914051103/http://www.rifftrax.com/rifftrax-presents to http://www.rifftrax.com/rifftrax-presents

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question on PD shorts

Should I add official links and/or citations for the public domain shorts that don't have articles of their own or no? Espngeek (talk) 01:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New title added

RiffTrax: Cobra (Trailer) Espngeek (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]