Talk:List of PlayStation 2 games (A–K)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Company after game in the list

Is this Company thing really a good idea? I think it's rather silly because when you click on the game, it gives you not only publisher information, but developer information as well. And to counter a future argument, titles without articles could have a page containing only that information initially if necessary.

Also, if a user is looking for titles by a specific company, then there should be a list dedicated to video game companies and games should be in the category of their company as well.

Simplicity is the most informative and effective method in explanation. - Blazingluke

The only reason to not include companies would be if they made it harder to navigate, and it doesn't. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:47, August 26, 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I can go along with that. - Blazingluke 19:05, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

List of PS2

You fools are all wondering why their are pictures in the list, and also for GC & PS2.

I did it, because it will make the list look better.

People will recoginze those games
Not just any picture, i added some noticable & popular games, for example Halo 2, but some people/wiki/vistors. Might want to put different pictures(that are not really popular, for example New Legend). And also no multiplatform game picture should be on, like Mortal Kombat, because if the picture is on there, then there should be a picture for GC & PS2 List.
All you have to do is...

• Put a picture of a famous game list for either ps2, xbox or GC
  • For example, Halo 2, Ninja Gaiden, Devil May Cry, Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker
• Delete multiplatform picture games,
  • accpet for special ones, for example Soul Calibure 2

That is all i ask

Thanks:P

>x<ino 17:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC) no need for these becasuse James Bond is 007.

• 007: Agent Under Fire (EA Games)
• 007: Everything or Nothing (EA Games)
• 007: Nightfire (EA Games)

What's the discussion here about, pictures? Pictures are best left in the respective article. This article has already exceeded the article size limit, which is ok since it's a list. Lets not complicate it anymore by adding pictures. Ceros 03:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Genres

PS2 and Xbox have the largest selections of games -- however, I believe PS2 trumps it. I think a separate article organized by genre might be helpful. Anakalypsis 02:23, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

PS3 software BC

Would it be useful for a Wikilist like this to also have a column that indicates whether a PS2 game is playable on the software emulator of the most recent PS3 firmware? Do mind that this would mean that each game also needs their catalogue numbers listed (ie. SLES------). This could however make the list rather messy. So what would you think? --193.75.228.252 15:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Listed Publisher

Games released in several regions will sometimes have a different publisher for each. Since the majority of the English Wikipedia's users are situated in North America, I believe the listed publisher should be the one who released NTSC-U/C version of the game in North America. If a Game was not released in NA, then the publisher from wherever the game is from should suffice. This article is meant to be more of a list than a resource for detailed information such as that. Users can easily click on the name of the game to view that kind of international information.- Blazingluke 19:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Games with more than one title

Should something be done about games released with a different title in other regions? Examples are Shadow of Memories/Shadow of Destiny, Siren/Forbidden Siren, Fahrenheit/Indigo Prophecy. I see that Indigo Prophecy is not on this list, but how should this list be standardized in this regard? I mean, should all multiple entries with different names be removed, or should each title have a separate entry? If we opt for the former, how do we decide which title to include in this list? New User 03:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

why isn't shadow the hedgehog on the list?

why isn't shadow the hedgehog on the list?

dunno but probably because it is multi-platform. If you think that it should be added, then add it yourself! --Oliver Barnard 14:19, 7 April 2006 (UTC) Why isn`t Sonic Unleashed on this list either? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.121.54 (talk) 22:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Progressive Scan games

I propose we either edit this list or start a new page to show which PS2 games offer progressive scan, and what if any special setup needs to be made to set the game in progressive scan. I have yet to be able to find such a list online. And many times the back of the game clamshell fails to mention that a game is indeed progressive scan compatible. Kona1611 19:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

And so I have begun a page (in its extremely infant stage): [now called] List of PlayStation 2 games with HD support. I hope to set it up to show which modes it supports and how to setup the game in progressive scan. Kona1611 19:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC) (revised) Kona1611 (talk) 05:55, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Include Jampacks?

The list includes at least one Jampack. Jampacks are just crappy demo compilation disks. Do they really belong on this page? There are at least 14 of them by now. I don't really think they belong in the pantheon of games, especially since they are more like marketing tools featuring butchered versions of future or new games. Any consensus? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.146.122.161 (talk • contribs) .

Probably should get rid of them. Thunderbrand 21:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

• I agree, Jampacks shouldn't be on there. Same goes for any other sample discs, demo discs, etc.

This is "List of PlayStation 2 Games". Demo disks and other promo disks should not be included. If someone is REALLY interested in collecting and documenting these type of disks I believe a seperate list should be created. Project23 (talk) 07:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

SLUS numbering

Should we add in the serial numbers? since every game & every disc has its own serial number, it might be very useful when refering to specific titles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterhuh (talk • contribs) 00:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree, would be a good use of the Added By space... which is pointless. --AeronPrometheus (talk) 21:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The Added By column is worse than pointless. It encourages a violation of Wikipedia guidelines, as discussed at Wikipedia:SIG which includes the following to-the-point remarks: Edits to articles should not be signed, as signatures on Wikipedia are not intended to indicate ownership or authorship of any Wikipedia article. Rather, the edit history takes care of the need to identify edits with users.

In its concept, the Added By column is not much different than the player check-in and shout-out sections which are regularly removed from articles when added. Of course, Wikipedia guidelines can be broken, but there needs to a good reason to do so. Here, there doesn't seem to be a good or even mediocre reason. I recommend the column either be deleted or changed to something else. Serial number sounds like a fine replacement. -- Michael Devore (talk) 22:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

I have done a little bit of reading on the web about how these SLxx numbers are generated. Due to variants and rereleases there might be several SLxx numbers for each Title. This is too complex to track in this quick and simple list. While SLxx information would be great on the individual game article for tracking things like release variants and related demos, I believe its more complex than items that need to be presented on this list. I vote NO for adding SLxx numbers to this list. Maybe look into adding a 'Known SLxx' section to the specific Titles entry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Project23 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

List Cleanup.

I added the {{clean-up}} template to this article because this list has no references for any game. There should be a reference from a news source (IGN, Gamespot, etc.) or some other third-party site for each game. I know a lot of these games are OLD and any reference to them have probably been taken down, but they still need a reference, even if it's from the Internet Archive. Ceros 03:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Changed to the {{listdev}} template. Development of playstation 2 games will end eventually so it's not correct to say this list will never be completed. Ceros 04:09, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I don't see what the big deal is. These lists have been this way for a while, and no complaints about references. If this needs references, the others do as well. Good luck on that huge task. People aren't making mass amounts of hoax articles or anything bad, so there is no issue here that I see. RobJ1981 07:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

People were adding a lot of games at List of Playstation 3 games without adding any references. I didn't think it was such a big deal to point out any references. I added references to them anyways and than I found that there were around 57 games that I couldn't find a source for. That's not good for an encyclopedia. How do I know that those 57 games are going on the PS3? What verifiable source is there to confirm this? Leaving speculative information on Wikipedia undermines it's credibility and goes against policy regardless. Check out Wikipedia's list guideline. It tells you that references must be added, and this goes for all lists. Ceros 18:09, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Here's something that can be useful for this list to use for references. Clicking on each game at that page will provide a developer, a publisher, a release date, and sometimes a picture. I'm not saying that everything at that site is totally accurate, but it's a good start. Eventually, this article should look something like the List_of_Virtual_Boy_games. I point out this list because it's a featured list and it's a list of games for a console. Ceros 05:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

first of all i think it would be rediculous to take any games off the list because they are unsourced, when it comes right down to it, the vast majority of ingo on wikipedia is unsourced, however, if you want to add a game to the list SOURCE IT FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!! its not hard to do. also a table-like organization would be nice. AlexOvShaolin 00:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm going to take down the tag. Sources are really only needed in lists for those consoles (such as the PS3) where pretty much everything on the list is an unreleased game and people are suspucious. What we should work on instead is creating stubs for all of these games so that their own articles can verify their existance. --SeizureDog 08:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Isn't there a way to verify if a catalogue number exists? All PS2 normally carry a catalogue number ie. SLES-56546. If you don't mind, I'll be creating a Wiki account and start adding my known catalgue numbers as a hidden comment in the article until it is allowed unhidden or disallowed completely by the other contributors --193.75.228.252 15:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

SOURCES: Due to the fact that this is a mature platform with a limited amount of unreleased/disputable material compared to the amount of existing releases (the bulk of the material), the source for the listing should be presented in the wikipedia article for the Title its self. The overwhelming majority of entries in this list have their own fleshed out article. Project23 (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

A mess

This article needs a huge cleanup.

1. Get rid of exclusivity
2. Get rid of genres
3. Get rid of online play
4. Replace flags with (NA), (PAL), (JP), etc.
5. Replace # and A with these (NA), (PAL), and (JP).

Regardless of it all, this article needs to be filled out, and once that happens, it will need a split. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I see what you mean. I would recommend the following table format: Wiki131wiki (talk) 19:41, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Title	Year	Developer(s)	Publisher(s)	Regions released
Grand Theft Auto III	2001	DMA Design	Rockstar Games

I cleaned up U-Z, didn't fill them all in but I did a large chunk of them. Not very fun work. >.> Should we still be using the Invisible flag to line them up though? Crimsonfox (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I personally like the idea of "exclusive" if someone would finish what they started. I'm personally thinking of doing it on the Gamecube and completing it myself. Rpgking4 (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

The year should not be linked though. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Complete Game List

Here is the official PS2 game list, arranged by release date. Hope it helps. http://www.us.playstation.com/Search?type=Games&System=ps2&search —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.59.222 (talk) 01:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello, added few things wondering why EU and not PAL

Hello, All Star Baseball 2005 was only released in NA

Im wondering why EU is used for the PAL games.

Even for games which were only released in Australia

Some (maybe 60) games were released in only one european region or in australia

examples : Ace Lightning (UK only) Australian Idol (Australia only)

EU should generally changed to PAL. Certain games like " PAL/UK " if they were only released there.

Languages supported would be nice as well.

who is still working on this list? how about getting a team together ?

cheers gbk —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBK666 (talk • contribs) 14:47, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Games not beginning with a letter??

What happened to the games that begin with a number or special character? Like 187 Ride or Die, or the .hack games for example. The list should start with those, but it starts with the "A"s, and I can't find those games anywere. Did someone just delete them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.156.36.103 (talk) 19:46, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

they are indeed missing. i will take care of this and add em. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBK666 (talk • contribs) 18:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

started working

re-made the 0-9 section which includes every ever released ps2 game starting with a number instead of a letter.

i use the flags instead of the region tags and also found a..so i believe infomative solution about different names of the same games in different regions

developers etc, will now be added to those games as well. gbk —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBK666 (talk • contribs) 18:58, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

i changed a few sizes of the table as well , especially to make release dates bigger, also i found a nice solution for re-releases/special editions etc.

guess i have to work alone on the 0-9 section for the next 2-3 days. gbk —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBK666 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Reply to Complete Game List

The link to the 'complete list' isn't up to date... games like Wipeout Pulse and Motorstorm Arctic Edge isn't on the list to the website link provided, also the list is to the versions which may be sold in North America.

The website managements may be lazy or they're too busy doing other things considering it's was the recession. Who knows! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.212.23 (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

I also have to add that I've found an updated new releases list on Gamespot under PS2 New Releases section. No link provided unfortunately as the section may get updated every week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.212.23 (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

heya, indeed . i am working my way trough the whole ps2 game library until i m done. today and tomorrow a bit more for the # games. and from saturday on "A" which will probably take at least one week for me . Anyone is welcome to help me or discuss how i update the list with me via this discussion. In about 3 months this list will be up to date for the most parts. GBK —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBK666 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'll add a few right now, there a few games that are not on the list, I also see that you're still doing A, I see what I can do to the rest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ika2010 (talk • contribs) 06:14, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

good to see someone else again wanting to add stuff to the list..i have time to continue the work soon with the few 0-9 games and then working on A

this list misses all in all around 40% of all ps2 games at least —Preceding unsigned comment added by GBK666 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Stargate SG-1: The Alliance

According to the article linked for this title, this game was never released. Should it be removed? --Suttkus (talk) 03:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

heya, yes it should..this is just a list of released ps2 titles --GBK666 —Preceding undated comment added 12:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC).

Halfway done with the "A" Cleanup # Done!

All ever released # PS2 Games can be found in this list now.

I m also more then halfway done with "A" which gets finished this week.

Nearly 100 games were added by myself hell this list was really messed up and very incomplete.

To get the whole PS2 Game list together i will probably need 6-10 Months.

For any questions, help offers, complaints please use this discussion GBK2010 (talk) 12:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

DONE! after around 6 hours of editing i m done with "A" all games released for the ps2 starting A are in the list now. there are still some grammar and link mistakes by me can anyone help? i start with "B" this weekend already GBK2010 (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

i think the article needs more removing articles than adding. especially those that have no existing article.Bread Ninja (talk) 16:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

This is supposed to be list of all ps2 games, so why would you want to remove games from it? Also even if part of games doesn't have articles, thanks to the list people will be able to see which of them needs articles. --Robixen (talk) 19:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

WP:REPEATLINK

Have no editors here heard of the above and if so does it not apply to this article? Mo ainm~Talk 19:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Psychic Force Complete

Hi i tried to search for this game but couldn't find anything apart from japanese games. is this game "Psychic Force Complete" exist on PS2 PAL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.104.139 (talk) 20:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Game not on list

"Michigan: Report From Hell" is not on this list. It was released in Japan and the EU, and it does have its own existing Wikipedia page at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan:_Report_from_Hell I do not know how to edit this list or I would add it. --50.133.233.65 (talk) 15:40, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Andrew

Untitled

I really do not know how to edit on Wikipedia, but Deer Hunter was released for the PS2. Here is a link to it: http://www.gamestop.com/ps2/games/deer-hunter/27496 It was made by Atari, and Coresoft. Here is even a link to it on Coresoft's own website. http://www.coresoft.com/page9/page9.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.43.201.2 (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

How many games in total?

The total number of games on the list was claimed to be 4512. Seemed a bit high, so I did a count and there's only 2014 listed. I've updated the page. Feel free to revert it if people have a different method of counting around here. 118.210.85.239 (talk) 00:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

A source would be better.Who knows if this list is complete/correct. -Koppapa (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Two years later: Sony discontinues the PS2 and says there are 10,828 games for the console. But these 10,828 games must include, like "Final Fantast X in japanese, Final Fantast X european version, Final Fantast X north-american version". Kotaku says 2875 games were released in Japan, this number is more believable, I guess. http://kotaku.com/5946852/the-playstation-2-still-has-one-new-game-left-to-offer Le Déchaîné (talk) 09:44, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Do we really need the little flags?

Part of the list has been updated to include little flags, but some of the list still does not, and I think it looks better to not include the flags instead just using the letters like NA, EU, etc. The flags are kinda distracting.69.212.126.168 (talk) 19:16, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I feel the same way or at least the flags on the year column need to be moved to the 'released in these countries column'. Also the the Year release should not be a date-it should be the year? If i don't get a "No, seriously don't do that!" by tomorrow I shall make those adjustments. :) Soliloquy259 (talk) 04:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Formatting

Lets format the page so it resembles the column display of the List Of PlayStation 3 And 4 Games. No? BatmobileFire (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

==Missing Deer Hunter

Missing game!

Dai Senryaku Exceed 7: Modern Military Tactics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daisenryaku#Dai_Senryaku_VII:_Modern_Military_Tactics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.200.83 (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Different titles for the same game

I was curious about other people's opinions on how to list games that have multiple different titles per region. I found one game that has 3 or 4 different titles, and it was listed at least 3 times. I removed the duplicates but one of those listings has a couple of the titles listed together. Do you prefer having just one title for a game (the original title) or having all titles listed together? Keep in mind it will link to the page that has all the titles for each region listed. Dilute13 (talk) 15:49, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Number of games

The part that says there are currently X number of games is incorrect. Does anyone know of a way for it to automatically update according to the number of games in the chart? Dilute13 (talk) 13:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Region availability

Someone has added in some dates for Europe instead of just a checkpart in the section that shows which regions the games are available in, so it's stretched out the column. Someone should probably go and erase those dates and just put checkmarks back instead. Dilute13 (talk) 09:57, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

The region availability info is definitely wrong in a lot of cases as well... I fixed Pro Evolution Soccer (probably the last released PS2 game) to show that it was released only in PAL territories, whereas before it was marked only as a NA release. Looking back at the table, it seems all the PES games are listed as NA exclusives in this page. The whole list needs a going-over, and probably a reformat at the same time. 73.175.184.175 (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Using release dates for the different regions instead of a check mark would bring this list more in line with the other game release lists: PS1, PS3, 3DS, Wii, Switch. Check marks could be left as placeholders pending the addition of date information? Thoughts? BadWiidTino (talk) 14:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I would be fine with that but it would be a lot of work to undertake Dilute13 (talk) 14:01, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Exclusive column

So a handful of users decided to go and remove all of the "exclusive" columns from video game pages so now we can't see which games are exclusive to the PS2. Lovely. Dilute13 (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, looking at the actual discussion, it'd be more accurate to say that a week long debate was held, and 10 editors unanimously supported its removal, but otherwise, yes. Sergecross73 msg me 19:30, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

I never said anything about how long they discussed it. 10 is a handful. Nothing I said was incorrect. I don't think it's fair that 10 people who appear to all be friends and none of them work on this page get to make a big decision like that. The only reason you came here now to leave a sassy comment is because you saw my comment on that page. I've put a lot of work on this page and I would've at least like to have been notified of the vote so I could've participated, then I could've notified some of my friends to come vote too the same way you guys did. Dilute13 (talk) 01:25, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Canvassing friends to come "vote" in your favor is against policy. It's also not a "vote" per say. It's a discussion based in policy, with the primary argument for removal being WP:NOTCATALOG. "It's useful" is not a counter-argument to this, and kinda reinforces that the information is being used for catalog purposes. -- ferret (talk) 01:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, I mean "I'll ping people to come vote" like you did Dilute13 (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

My point was that you appeared to be claiming that a few ("handful") people did this on a whim, when it was a week spanning discussion among 10+ experienced editors. The rest of what you're saying seems to be a misunderstanding of how a WP:WIKIPROJECT works. It's not a place where you "call your friends in for help". We were all already there - we all have the page on our WP:WATCHLIST and see discussions come up. These editors already visit all the time, and chime in on various discussions and issues going on in video game related articles. Feel free to join in and discuss things if you have input you feel is missing, but you're not going to get anywhere arguing that we shouldn't be able to come to conclusions based on WikiProject-level discussions. It's one of the main acceptable methods of problem solving on Wikipedia. Sergecross73 msg me

I didn't even know that page existed. Like I said, it would've been nice if someone had mentioned here on the talk page that there was a vote going on that affects this page. I understand how Wikiproject works but it's just frustrating that 10 users who all know each other decide how all the video game pages on Wikipedia will be because most people aren't interested in getting involved or even know how to. I'm sure that there are a lot of users who use and appreciated that exclusive column. 10 is hardly a large amount of people to get a good representation. Anyway, it's over now and there's nothing I can do about it. Dilute13 (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Release date fixing to comply with other lists.

Would it be a bother if we could add an Australasia column, separate the European column, and instead of checkmarks, put the actual release dates? Zacharyalejandro (talk) 00:07, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

I agree that we should have specific release dates for each region but it would be a lot of work to do. Dilute13 (talk) 18:57, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Genre column

Is there a reason this list doesn't have a genre column? Most other console game lists I've seen have them L ke (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Variant names

OniiYig I don't think we need to list the variant names of each video game here. Onetwothreeip (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Primary English name should suffice. -- ferret (talk) 17:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

OniiYig, can you address this? Your edits are adding many bytes to the article. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I should be done with all of this soon enough, I think that variant names should be included since there are many games that are known under different names between American and PAL regions (Fahrenheit and Indigo Prophecy being a well-known example), let alone Japanese releases. Once all is said and done, this list should be split in two due to its size. Like the list of Xbox 360 games, which is split in two sections - A-L and M-Z. Then sources can be added for the games in each list. OniiYig (talk) 03:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Listing variant names is not something we do for other lists and that sort of information should be available on their articles if it's notable enough. This is an English language website for readers who use English. I think games with drastically different English titles are very few and we can handle those specifically. As for splitting the list, we can pretty much do that at any time, especially since you're revising through the list alphabetically. The problem is that if the size of this list continues to grow then we may need to split this list into more than two, but I'd rather find other ways to reduce the size first. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Article size

Given the size of this article, it would ordinarily be split alphabetically as the other lists of video games have been. However, there are other issues here. There are clearly many entries here that do not have Wikipedia articles and also don't have references, so that raises concerns over notability. The last three columns, describing the regional availability of the video games are also not entirely necessary to the table. Would anybody be opposed to removing those columns? Onetwothreeip (talk) 08:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Removing the regional availability has so far not really gained traction on any of the lists. I personally don't care, but I suspect you won't get far if you attempt to remove them. -- ferret (talk) 15:42, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

I was literally JUST using this article, compiling a list of titles which I am looking to acquire, and have been using the regional availability, seeing as I only want to see NA released titles. Now, if I want to see if a title was released in NA, without opening the entire article, I have to squint really hard at the tiny letters next to the release dates. I'm sure others will find this annoying as well. Could you please revert it back? 67.246.111.31 (talk) 00:52, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

I would be opposed to removing the regional availability columns. I don't see how having the columns there negatively affect the page, aside from the size contribution. The region columns allow the user to sort by which games were released in what region. So, for example, if someone is only interested in games released in North America, then they can organize the list to show games released in North America first, followed by games that were not released in North America. I think this makes for a more user friendly experience, particularly for game collectors that are only interested in games released in their regions, without having to scour through hundreds of visual novels.OniiYig (talk) 00:55, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

I have reverted it back to the way it was. OniiYig (talk) 01:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for making your concern known. There are many columns that could theoretically be added to the table. There are also far too many games listed here which are simply not notable. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

There are many games which may not be "notable" available on the PS2, there are hundreds of shovelware games that came out on it, but they're still games that were released on the PS2. I think that that should be the criteria for what goes into the list, regardless of how obscure the game may be. There are gameplay videos for these games, many even have ebay listings, these games exist. Due to the fact that many of these games do not have wikipedia articles, if the games with missing links were instead posted as plain text without the links, maybe these games could be added back in? Would this be a reasonable compromise? OniiYig (talk) 19:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

If they have no article, at the very least a source to verify the game exists, developer, and release date is needed. -- ferret (talk) 19:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

There's no reason for this article to include all the PlayStation 2 video games that have ever existed. I don't doubt that they exist, they just aren't helpful to the average reader. If an article is made about these games then of course we could add them back into the list. Onetwothreeip (talk) 23:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

@Onetwothreeip: At this point we're in a WP:BRD situation. Your efforts the trim the article have met resistance so you're going to need to establish consensus on whether to remove columns, or reduce the inclusion criteria (otherwise not defined here yet) to be only "notable" games. -- ferret (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

That's right. I should also add that the reason not to link video games for which there are no articles is the same reason as not including them in the article. They simply aren't notable and don't meet any criteria for inclusion. If they did meet some sort of criteria there should be an article about it, even if it's only a stub article, and then should be included here in this list. I would like OniiYig to explain what they are doing with the article. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:01, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Actually, WP:LISTN specificity mentions that not all items on a list must be notable enough for an article. -- ferret (talk) 02:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)?

It also says we can decide for long lists (this is one of the longest if not the longest single article list on Wikipedia) that we can restrict the criteria to entries with articles. At the very least we can include entries that don't have articles as long as reliable sources discuss them. The point is that they should be notable, not simply just exist. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

The inclusion criteria for this list is the existence of the video game. Notability applies to article creation, not to content. (There are certain other types of lists where the individual entries must be notable, but that is not the case here.) You'll need to use an RfC to create a consensus to change the scope of the article before you can start deleting entries. If there were no objections this wouldn't be necessary, but there are objections, so a consensus must be reached. So far continued deletions are against consensus. -- BullRangifer (talk) 02:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Okay, the behaviour of you and others from the Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections article following me onto other articles is seriously concerning. All participants on the talk page here have been perfectly respectful and we are very capable of discussing these issues.

In short, lists do have notability criteria. See WP:LISTN. Onetwothreeip (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

The list itself has notability criteria. The entries of the list do not. While an RFC isn't necessary, a regular discussion will suffice, BullRangifer is otherwise correct in that you'll need to have a discussion to set a specific inclusion criteria that all entries must be notable. To quote LISTN:

Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable, although editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles.

In the absence of a consensus to narrow the inclusion criteria, the essential default is that any valid verifiable entry of the topic fits. None of our video game platform articles follow a "notable only" criteria however, so I believe we should not make an exception here. I'll oppose narrowing the inclusion criteria. This does not mean that unverifiable entries cannot be removed. Everything still has to pass WP:V. -- ferret (talk) 11:56, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Per WP:LISTN editors may, at their discretion, choose to limit large lists by only including entries for independently notable items or those with Wikipedia articles. WP:LISTCRITERIA is also important here. The criteria for the other video games lists are not well defined either, but they are not as permissive generally as this list has been. I do agree that we should at least verify these video games as existing, and without their own Wikipedia articles or reliable sources we simply do not have that assurance. I'm not proposing anything that I think anybody would oppose, but our inclusion criteria should prevent regional variants of the same video game from being listed, especially since the variants are not notable themselves. Onetwothreeip (talk) 03:15, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm trying to be patient here.... As already noted, yes, we the editors can at our discretion limit the inclusion critiera, if we establish a consensus to do so. It's not some automatic thing that happens but simply something that may happen. In the context of list entries here, yes, we should not have individual rows for different regional variants. For any game we can find a source for though, it does not require that they also pass WP:GNG and have an article. @OniiYig: should be given a chance to source the entries, as they have been working hard to revise the list and add missing entries. Metacritic, GameRankings, even a single review (from an RS), would be enough to prove a given entry exists. -- ferret (talk) 11:39, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you would be impatient since it seems we are agreeing. I've been seeking to start a discussion on things like inclusion criteria, before the page is split like the other video game list articles. Onetwothreeip (talk) 02:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough, but I'd start a clean section away from this one. -- ferret (talk) 11:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Apologies if I'm editing this wrong (not sure on the markup/etc) -- I am getting use out of this list listing all ps2 games. If it wasn't trying to be inclusive, it would serve no purpose. Why bother only listing some games? Somewhere on the internet, we need a comprehensive list. If we cannot look to wikipedia for such knowledge, then we're not fulfilling our goal here, since that information is imo going to be less groomed elsewhere online. Once every game is listed, it's done.. the work is done, the fruits of the labor can be used. Granted indie releases or other abnormal things may arise. I do not think the scope of this should change from being inclusive if there is no list elsewhere. We can always ask some game communities what they think. An unused article is just as helpful as no article, while also taking up resources. There are collectors out there, a list like this is needed. "There's no reason for this article to include all the PlayStation 2 video games that have ever existed. I don't doubt that they exist, they just aren't helpful to the average reader. If an article is made about these games then of course we could add them back into the list." Was said above, and well, I don't think the "average" person is going to "read an article" that is actually just a list of games for a console. There is no readability about it, imo. I think it's either disingenuous or not thought out to treat this list like it's something that will be read like a book rather than consulted like the chart that it is.

What are the practical uses of this list? What uses could people get out of a noninclusive list? What uses could people get out of an inclusive list? Realizing that will tell you what necessarily should be in the article, no? Mofuggin bob (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Checkmark system

I kinda hate this. This list doesn't allow you to list the release dates of games specifically in North America in order. Instead, you have to sneak your way through the "First released" section and it's kinda garbage. 88.88.203.247 (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Is a reference needed to be posted in order to update FIFA 14: Legacy Edition

According to ESPN Deportes, FIFA 14 was released on in North America for the PS2 on September 24, 2013 along side most of the other versions in that region. Do I need to add this as a reference on the list page itself in order to update it?

Carl177 (talk) 09:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

References

I think it just got missed when we dug that up a few years ago. Add the NA date. -- ferret (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Table Update

The table's interface is very outdated compared to some other game list pages. Consider combining the two pages and making it more in line with the tables for the Dreamcast, GameCube, and original Xbox. Venomouswario (talk) 02:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

It's not outdated. It's split because of technical limitations due to the sheer number of games in comparison to those other platforms. The layout is fairly standard. -- ferret (talk) 19:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)