Talk:List of Picasso artworks 1889–1900

Lists Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

All titles in french??

L'enfant de chœur?

There is no way L'enfant de chœur (1896) could be these dimensions (6493 x 78432 miles). Is this a legitimate painting? What are its true dimensions? Clerks 19:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This link (Picasso Fraud) says that the piece is 76 X 50 cm and has been incorrectly attributed to Picasso. I'm not comfortable making this call as I am not an art expert. Clerks 19:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.33.183 (talk) 17:28, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Combine Works

Why are these works all divided up? Some periods only have a few works on the entire page. It's annoying, not helpful, and bad organization. I propose making a list of all works by date, which can be sorted alphabetically.-DMCer 13:30, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

This article is not formatted in a consistent manner, hence the addition of the cleanup template. The first three years are formatted as tables, the rest as bulleted lists. The page needs to be cleaned up for consistency. Fieryninja (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After reviewing the page I am not convinced that the table format works for this page. This is a long list of works, with no wikilinks, details or images currently available within Wikipedia. The tables therefore appear to just create clutter and make the page even longer. I would therefore suggest we keep it simple as a series of bullet lists throughout. I can do this myself unless there are any objections. Thanks Fieryninja (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]