Jump to content

Talk:List of Newport County A.F.C. players

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

this

[edit]

There's a problem with this article. It says List of Newport County A.F.C. players, yet non (or the large large majority) of players on the list didn't play for County since the club reformed as A.F.C. and only played for them as Newport County F.C. since the criteria is that only appearances in the Football League. I don't see the point in this, professional clubs have articles on players who have played 100 appearances of more and there hasn't been a problem there with articles being too large. On the official website a few years there was a list of players with over 100 apps. since the reform and there was only 30 players. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.195.69.73 (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


In a footballing sense everyone accepts the original club and the new club are the same for all purposes of football history - hence the details of the new club and old club are in one article. I think your point is a more general one that the old club and new club could be two separate wiki articles - but that would be somewhat churlish towards the staff, current/former players, supporters and media who know the new club to be a continuation of the old club. The old/new split was only a sad quirk of the financial history.Pwimageglow (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Newport County A.F.C. players. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]