Talk:List of New England Fifty Finest

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A 5-year- error

Sometimes wikipedia editing is good, sometimes not so good. Back in 2013, an anonymous editor added a 51st m0untain that didn't belong. That was removed within a month or two, but all of us failed to notice that the editor had changed the introductory sentence to say that this is a list of 51 peaks. That silly, incredibly obvious error has been there for five years!

oops. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 17:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if it stayed up there because there are two mountains entered at number 26. Now, since we're talking prominence, only one of them would have the right amount, but we don't know which one. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting - of course since No. 26 is an "or" not an "and" there are still only 50 peaks, we just don't know one of them exactly. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 20:45, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Who maintains this list?

An editor has pointed out an obvious question: Who draws up this list? Goig online I find it cited many times but no source as to who measured the prominences. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 13:42, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable?

It's inside baseball. The term & concept is something almost like a brand, that an individual person dreamed up in recent times, and promoted, perhaps through a club?? Perhaps unlike Scotland's older, more widely known "Munro" concept, this topic is not really ripe for appearing here. 32.221.207.102 (talk) 15:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]