Talk:List of Nevada historical markers

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Nevada (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nevada, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NevadaWikipedia:WikiProject NevadaTemplate:WikiProject NevadaNevada articles

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pictures in the notes section

I have a concern with the practice of placing pictures in the Notes column. This encourages readers to upload a picture for EVERY entry in the table, which would result in hundreds of pictures and make the article unreadable for viewers with small screens and slow internet connections. Any objection to me moving the pictures out of the notes column and keeping a few above and/or below the table? Dave (talk) 19:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that argument has merit, given there are plenty of similar articles to this with pictures for each little entry in a table. However, a better argument would be "they are historical MARKERS". They pretty much look the same, generally (a few odd-balls). If, however, we show pictures of the items the markers are describing, then that would argue for keeping them. Famartin (talk) 21:35, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't the notes really references for the listing? perhaps they should be in the Marker Name column (after the marker name) and the notes column could be a link to the image (not the image itself). Or better yet, the text from the marker. That would be a long text box, and maybe it would be more descriptive and load faster. Trilotat (talk) 00:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having the images as 100px links provides the user with more information about the sign, such as reading the actual text. If the images are small, then this should not be an issue. Cxbrx (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Nevada historical markers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130204045518/http://nvshpo.org/home-topmenu-17-17/historical-markers.html to http://nvshpo.org/home-topmenu-17-17/historical-markers.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]